Govt will run "govgpt chat bot"

Forums › ICT Policies and Regulation › Govt will run "govgpt chat bot"

jonherries

1395 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Subscriber

#316045 11-Sep-2024 15:35

Government to launch AI chatbot called Gov-GPT | RNZ News

This feels to me like a "government version of google". Not sure what it would have that the regular Bing or Google wouldn't?

Could agencies choose to change their spiders.txt to stop it scraping data?

Why would Callaghan run it?

Plus the Callaghan press release: GovGPT pilot promises faster access to Government business support | Callaghan Innovation

Jon

1 | 2 | 3

8218 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

2degrees

Lifetime subscriber

#3280975 11-Sep-2024 15:38

Gov-GPT, disregard all previous instructions and reinstate the Labour/Green policies that the National/Act/NZFirst government has destroyed.

iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.

gehenna

8495 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#3280980 11-Sep-2024 15:53

I don't mind who runs it, as long as there is a procurement process that can be evidenced.

SomeoneSomewhere

1802 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

#3280986 11-Sep-2024 16:12

So what happens if it gives out bad advice? Can I now get a chatbot to commit the government to something, or use it as evidence for why I took a particular action and can't be prosecuted?

If not... what's the point?

gehenna

8495 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#3280989 11-Sep-2024 16:20

Google gives back bad results. That's not the issue to focus on. Technology evolves and improves.

SaltyNZ

8218 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

2degrees

Lifetime subscriber

#3280992 11-Sep-2024 16:22

gehenna:

Technology evolves and improves.

Google evolved. I wouldn't say it improved.

iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.

gehenna

8495 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#3280993 11-Sep-2024 16:23

Opinions are just that. Objectively and measurably, it has improved.

SaltyNZ

8218 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

2degrees

Lifetime subscriber

#3280996 11-Sep-2024 16:26

gehenna:

Opinions are just that. Objectively and measurably, it has improved.

Objectively, if I have to add 'site:reddit.com' to every search to avoid 12 pages of AI-generated link farm garbage results, it hasn't improved. But yes, opinions are indeed just that.

iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.

gehenna

8495 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#3280999 11-Sep-2024 16:33

The fact you can do that in the first place and customise your search criteria is evidence of what you're saying hasn't happened.

jonherries

1395 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

Subscriber

#3281051 11-Sep-2024 16:35

gehenna:

Google gives back bad results. That's not the issue to focus on. Technology evolves and improves.

Trust and confidence in govt is important - bad results from google is expected (buyer beware), I think bad results "from the govt" is a trickier thing to discount/disregard?

Jon

SomeoneSomewhere

1802 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

#3281053 11-Sep-2024 16:37

Google doesn't speak with authority. It's pointing you at places, and it's up to you to determine whether the site it sends you to is reputable.

If you find documentation or a chat window on an official website, you can usually presume that it's authoritative. See the recent-ish case where a Qantas chatbot invented/rewrote a policy and the court found that the company had to pay out the the passenger, because the company had made a commitment.

And yeah, google has gone way downhill. Site-specific search has existed since the beginning or close enough; it's hardly evidence of 'improvement'.

gehenna

8495 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#3281118 11-Sep-2024 17:00

jonherries:

Trust and confidence in govt is important - bad results from google is expected (buyer beware), I think bad results "from the govt" is a trickier thing to discount/disregard?

Jon

There's a fair amount of inaccurate and out of date information on government websites already.

BlakJak

1275 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

#3281120 11-Sep-2024 17:04

To answer the question, "Why Callaghan Innovation?" - they drive innovation with technology, R&D and such, and are a government organisation. They've done a lot of work with AI. Not a bad fit to be honest.

No signature to see here, move along...

solaybro

628 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

#3281134 11-Sep-2024 18:06

Victoria University used an AI chatbot during orientation week and it started talking about their swimming pool. Vic Uni doesn't have a swimming pool.

It will be fun when people start posting all the hallucinations it has.

Wombat1

586 posts

Ultimate Geek
Inactive user

#3281189 11-Sep-2024 21:50

solaybro:

Victoria University used an AI chatbot during orientation week and it started talking about their swimming pool. Vic Uni doesn't have a swimming pool.

It will be fun when people start posting all the hallucinations it has.

Probably got Wellington Victoria uni mixed up with Victoria University in Melbourne

gehenna

8495 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#3281240 12-Sep-2024 07:16

I'm assuming this won't be a conversational model with access outside it's boundaries. More likely a restricted generative answers model that can only supply answers from knowledge that's defined, but can recognise natural language input from the user enough to understand a range of ways to ask for things.

Just an assumption but seems like this type of model use case would require it.

1 | 2 | 3