Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Linuxluver

5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

#69284 5-Oct-2010 21:21
Send private message

First time in my life I actually gave money to RapidShare to allow me to download the Froyo ROM for the Galaxy S. 

Guess what?

You still have to wait.
You still download at slow speeds.....

But it will all be better if you sign up for....drum roll.....Rapid Pro!

What a scam.

Bittorrent is so much better.....if people would learn to share instead of wanting something for nothing. 
 




_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
billgates
4705 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #388486 5-Oct-2010 21:24
Send private message

Hotfile is pretty good actually. Way better than rapidshare.




Do whatever you want to do man.

  



aim

aim
247 posts

Master Geek


  #388491 5-Oct-2010 21:34
Send private message

I use mediafire, no waiting. The only file sharing site I've given money too... well I've given TPB money indirectly - they sponsored a project which I donated to :)

But yes, bit torrent is awesome. Anonymous, and fast - pity most people leech. My torrent server has a share ratio limit of 1.6 and a time ratio of 2.0, once either of those conditions are met, it stops seeding and removes the torrent. Otherwise the server starts running out of space hehe.
Love my Ubuntu headless server :)

Disrespective
1925 posts

Uber Geek


  #388527 5-Oct-2010 22:33
Send private message

Rapidshare recently changed their pricing and policies (in part through threats of litigation i believe). Consequently they suck balls.

I have used or currently do use, Hotfile, Fileserve and Megaupload with much more success.

I moved from torrents after the first wave of isp throttling came into affect a few years ago and getting my linux iso's became a hateful exercise.



Linuxluver

5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #388557 6-Oct-2010 00:07
Send private message

Disrespective: Rapidshare recently changed their pricing and policies (in part through threats of litigation i believe). Consequently they suck balls.

I have used or currently do use, Hotfile, Fileserve and Megaupload with much more success.

I moved from torrents after the first wave of isp throttling came into affect a few years ago and getting my linux iso's became a hateful exercise.


I had poor bittorrent performance until I bought a better router. Cheap routers get totally bogged by the number of connections. Slow processors, low RAM and software with memory leaks. My ancient DSE re-badged Connectix beat the crap out of any of them for going 6 months without a power cycle and being as fast on the last day as it was on the first. But to speed was 4mb...and my link can do 7mb.  

Since then, I had cheapo DLink (3 of them), Linksys (useless 'toilet seat' thing...) and TPLink...and bittorrent was very poor at peak times on all of them.....and I thought the ISP was shaping it to death.  

Then I paid twice as much for a Netcomm....and amazingly....I'm downloading linux ISOs at high speed at 8pm on a weeknight....every night.

*Amazingly* the BEST bittorrent client I have seen is AndTorrent on my phone. It is *relentless*. It grabs 15 or 20 peers....sucks REAL hard (500kbps).....and when they begin to fail it grabs 15-20 more...and just keeps on going. Grab, suck, drop, grab.... I've seen it download 350MB in under 20 minutes...in my shirt pocket.

For sheer grunt....it's King...and an odd one at that, being on my phone.  




_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


timbosan
2159 posts

Uber Geek


  #388582 6-Oct-2010 06:55
Send private message

linuxluver - just wondering what modem do you have? I am on my third in a year (a TPLink), before that a Telecom Thompson, and before that another, still not 100% happy.

I have looked at commercial grade rack mounted stuff but the price jump is huge.  Why doesn't someone make a top quality consumer grade modem, no wireless, I am sure there is a market for it.

Ragnor
8219 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #388954 6-Oct-2010 21:32
Send private message

ADSL modem that does half bridge + router that can be flashed with open source firmware (tomatousb, dd-wrt, open wrt) is the way.

Basically this
http://www.ben.geek.nz/2006/11/adsl-routing-solution-in-detail/

However that's several years old now so I'd go with a TP Link TD 8840 for the modem and Asus RT-N16 for the router

aim

aim
247 posts

Master Geek


  #388960 6-Oct-2010 21:41
Send private message

Linksys. cisco R&D without the price tag.

WRT54 is king.





That thing was awesome.

But more recently;




And for the present?

The 320N



 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
Disinfo
80 posts

Master Geek


  #388969 6-Oct-2010 21:51
Send private message

aim: Linksys. cisco R&D without the price tag.

WRT54 is king.





That thing was awesome.


Be careful here - there are a tonne of different hardware revisions of the old 54g with later ones having much less ram and completely different  (and slower performance).   You really need to install DD-WRT for decent performance and some of the later revisions are incapable of running it.

I've found the really cheap Belkin models keep up with my 10Mb connection fine - you can easily pull down 1MB/s+ on a decently seeded torrent

Ragnor
8219 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #389249 7-Oct-2010 16:11
Send private message

Yeah WRT54GL or WRT54-TM were the best models, however Asus WL-520GU has more cpu and flash. Also for wireless N and gigabit you want to be looking at something newer.


billgates
4705 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #389255 7-Oct-2010 16:21
Send private message

DSE XH9949 + Asus RT-N16 loaded with tomato = Awesome-0 combo




Do whatever you want to do man.

  

kiwijunglist
2981 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

  #389290 7-Oct-2010 18:42
Send private message

For those using downloading sites like rapidshare, mediashare, megaupload, hotfile etc etc I have found Jdownloader download manager with flashgot addon for firefox really useful. Basically you just copy the file sharing url and JDownloader automatically grabs anything that is from a file sharing site in the clipboard and will download it. You don't have to worry about waiting 30 secounds for the download link to appear or anything like that. If you install flashgot with jdownloader you can right click and download. I didn't really like download managers, but i think jdownloader seems quite good.




HTPC / Home automation (home assistant) enthusiast.


Ragnor
8219 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #389334 7-Oct-2010 20:43
Send private message

billgates: DSE XH9949


Discontinued model now.

Thesedays:

TP Link TD 8840 
Dynalink RTA 1320E
Netcomm NB6Plus4

.. all pretty much using the same or similar chipest and firmware.

Also Draytek Vigor 120 (full pppoa to pppoe bridging) if you are willing to spend a bit more.

jtbthatsme
937 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  #389355 7-Oct-2010 21:48
Send private message

Only filesharing site I have paid for is Megaupload. Through my browser speeds are consistantly around 400kBps but using the Mega Manager (their version of a download manager) i could and would more often than not easily get 1000kBps and up to about 1400kBps. It is about $19 USD for 3 months access and well worth it.

Also in regards to the filesharing site like Hotfile, Rapidshare and Megaupload they all have advantages and disadvantages.  I belong to a xbox forum that most people on would say MU is the best.  A lot do also recommend using JDownloader as mentioned above personally i do not like JDownloader and opt for easier to use download managers. Megamanager is good but does not like it when your router resets or something and would result in either corupt downloads or requiring a restart (henceforth using more bandwidth.

Yeah of course you may be able to get similar speeds off a bittorrent client but your more likely to get caught out too if downloading copyrighted material which i would not recommend. As you do get caught and it can have some serious outcomes for the few that do get caught. Unless of course your one of these people that like the odds and like to take a gamble. As in probably less than a few hundred ever prosecuted against the millions plus files downloaded every day.

Of course in pointing out those odds I know of more than one person (as in friends not online friends either) that have received official copyright infrningement warnings for downloading of copyright material.  So be warned people do actually get caught here in good old NZ too.

1080p
1332 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #389369 7-Oct-2010 22:22
Send private message

For higher grade home routing I would suggest getting a high quality Draytek Vigor 120 ADSL modem and building yourself a pfSense router. The hardware requirements for pfSense are tiny for small networks such as home (even runs on embedded hardware) and it is so much more powerful and feature filled than many consumer grade routers. Best thing is, if you have the parts lying around, setup is free ;)

I currently run this setup and uptime has been since I built it (several months now) and performance is rock solid.

Over time I have found that the number of connections needed for bittorrent are fairly small compared to what many users set in their client. I currently have my client configured for a maximum 400 connections globally and 90 peers per torrent (this is excessive) and all the stuff I leech comes down at maximum capacity (either it maxes out my connection or the seeder has a limited upstream).

What is a more important concern is your ISPs quality of international connectivity. You are guaranteed a much smoother experience if you pay for a premium plan with nice international connectivity (read: you will not experience a smooth bittorrent experience on a $60 p/m all-you-can-eat plan ;)

dman
953 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #389398 8-Oct-2010 01:56
Send private message

the problem with all these file sharing sites is there are far far too many of them (rapidshare, mediashare, megaupload, hotfile etc etc).

What is the point of paying for one when the next distro you might happen to hunt down is instead on a different site.... better to stick to bittorent, or usenet




 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.