![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
richms: LED would be ideal if they didnt only light up one end of the glass.
rhysb:richms: LED would be ideal if they didnt only light up one end of the glass.
LED Panel lights solve that problem.
http://www.aliexpress.com/store/group/LED-ceiling-lights-Panel-lights/612156_211692937.html?categoryId=200002295
Nety: There is one from July 2012 but still woefully out of date, cannot see any newer updates, agree cannot see any reason to still recommend CFL other then light outputs that LED is just not producing yet in the form factors used.
mattwnz:
Cost is probably the only reason to still go for CFL, as you can sometime get philips U shapped ones for $2 per bulb in a 5 pack, and they don't use much more power than LED.
I have found that the philips LEDs do get very hot on the white base. There must be a lot of room to make them more efficient, as a lot of energy must still be getting lost in heat.
richms:mattwnz:
Cost is probably the only reason to still go for CFL, as you can sometime get philips U shapped ones for $2 per bulb in a 5 pack, and they don't use much more power than LED.
I have found that the philips LEDs do get very hot on the white base. There must be a lot of room to make them more efficient, as a lot of energy must still be getting lost in heat.
Not really, the ends of the tube have to be heated to get the current to flow thru the gas. That is why the efficiancy on the small CFL's is so lousy - still the same electrodes to heat for a stupid little tube.
richms: The ratings on CFLs are totally bogus in most cases, I have some "23" watt ones that suck down close to 30 on the watt meter. Still dont compete with a 150W incan which they are supposed to equal either.
MattR: Wonder if its any good.
You can never have enough Volvos!
'We love to buy books because we believe we’re buying the time to read them.' WARREN ZEVON
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |