![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
networkn:
At 74K I think you'd find most manufacturers put together a higher quality if obviously less technically advanced vehicle.
And therein lies the tradeoff, one which it seems a lot of people are more than willing to take (myself included).
SumnerBoy:
networkn:
At 74K I think you'd find most manufacturers put together a higher quality if obviously less technically advanced vehicle.
And therein lies the tradeoff, one which it seems a lot of people are more than willing to take (myself included).
Which is fine, but claiming it has good/great build quality isn't accurate (At least not in any Telsa I've ever seen in the flesh).
networkn:
At 74K I think you'd find most manufacturers put together a higher quality if obviously less technically advanced vehicle.
I guess the question is, if you're exaggerating the cost are you also exaggerating the issues? ;)
Looking to buy a Tesla? Use my referral link and we both get credits
Obraik:
networkn:
At 74K I think you'd find most manufacturers put together a higher quality if obviously less technically advanced vehicle.
I guess the question is, if you're exaggerating the cost are you also exaggerating the issues? ;)
Multiple people in the last few days have spoken about their 100K spend, and if I was to buy one, the features I'd need to make it comparable to a 3 Series BMW I'd buy, would make it 100K. Also, I am pretty confident, most 75K cars from other manufacturers wouldn't have the mismatching panels and rough edges I viewed myself. If you are fortunate enough your model doesn't have it, that's great for you.
networkn:
Which is fine, but claiming it has good/great build quality isn't accurate (At least not in any Telsa I've ever seen in the flesh).
It really depends on what you are comparing it to. The original question was whether Tesla has improved, and the general concensus is that it has (I can't comment as my M3 is the first Tesla I have sat in). But if you are comparing to an equivalent European car then you will likely come to a different concensus.
My car has one thing which bugs me, a rear door that doesn't close smoothly, but I am very confident it is a simple adjustment and have contacted Tesla support to get it resolved. Other than that the finish is of a very high standard IMO.
I have a Model X and if you compare the 2017 and prior vs anything 2018 and beyond the build quality is much better in my view.
networkn:
Multiple people in the last few days have spoken about their 100K spend, and if I was to buy one, the features I'd need to make it comparable to a 3 Series BMW I'd buy, would make it 100K. Also, I am pretty confident, most 75K cars from other manufacturers wouldn't have the mismatching panels and rough edges I viewed myself. If you are fortunate enough your model doesn't have it, that's great for you.
From a numbers point, 70% of the registered Model 3's are the SR+ (the base $74k model).
I'm not saying there aren't some cars that have some fitment issues or quality issues with the paint. However, based on the people getting their cars there hasn't been a whole lot of noise from people. So either the issues aren't widespread or people are indifferent about them. When it comes to paint and alignment issues, these two me are minor quality issues - they might not look great but it's not affecting the actual car and are fairly easily fixed. Mechanical quality issues are what I care about.
Looking to buy a Tesla? Use my referral link and we both get credits
networkn:At 74K I think you'd find most manufacturers put together a higher quality if obviously less technically advanced vehicle.
_____________________________________________________________________
I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies....
“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. Carl Sagan 1996
networkn:
Multiple people in the last few days have spoken about their 100K spend, and if I was to buy one, the features I'd need to make it comparable to a 3 Series BMW I'd buy, would make it 100K. Also, I am pretty confident, most 75K cars from other manufacturers wouldn't have the mismatching panels and rough edges I viewed myself. If you are fortunate enough your model doesn't have it, that's great for you.
I've been examining, for some time, my own thoughts and reactions to the build quality issue and other issues. You mention BMW. That's relevant in an interesting way. Similarly Mercedes or Jaguar or other incumbent luxury care maker.
Many people spending big money today on a Tesla have never owned any of those brands...and probably never would. I'd never buy a BMW or Merc. My whole life I've been a "ten years old and $10,000" car buyer. New enough to be in a decent state. Old enough to be proven reliable. For a petrol car.
The first time I ever broke that rule was to buy a 24kWh Nissan LEAF. I paid $29k for it. I loved it, But I wanted a bit more range so 3 months later I bought a newer 30kWh LEAF from the UK for $45k. I broke the rule *again*. But the car was (and remains) awesome. So cheap to run. No service required in 3 years other than tyres and wheel alignments. So quiet. But powerful.
OK....Let's have more of that. Petrol is dead to me. Too dirty, expensive to run and keep running....and ultimately unreliable....and killing the planet, too.
So what's the ultimate of the moment? A Tesla. I'm REALLY breaking my 10yr/$10k rule this time. Nine times over and then some.
Build quality? Compared to what? Cars I was never ever going to buy anyway and actually have almost no experience of? No. They just are not relevant.
My Model 3 will be long ranged, quiet, clean, reliable.....and maybe have a cosmetic issue or two....but what can I compare it to? Nothing really.
I'm not offering this as argument. It's more of a thought experiment as to why the build quality of ICE cars many would never buy just isn't a factor in their / my thinking. We (whoever agrees with this, anyway) don't live in that world anymore.
I hope that makes sense. :-)
_____________________________________________________________________
I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies....
networkn:maxeon:BlinkyBill:I haven’t owned a Tesla for a couple of years now - has the build quality improved?
Absolutely
Absolutely? That's probably taking it a bit far. I have seen 3 model 3's in the flesh in the past 2 weeks, including one in a showroom. They are still extremely average compared to every other car I've seen at 100K (Rough edges in some places, mismatched alignment on panels).
Chances are if you bought any other car at 100K you'd be pretty unhappy. ;)
Guilliman: GVI Penrose have a 2015 Model S P85 for $79850, how would that compare with a base Model 3.
Carjam throws out some really interesting data on that car, it did 40,000Km last year!!.
Guilliman: GVI Penrose have a 2015 Model S P85 for $79850, how would that compare with a base Model 3.
If it's a 2015 then it's an import, probably from Japan. Due to using a different charging connector, you won't be able to supercharge it in NZ and you'll need adapters for any other charger. The Autopilot hardware will be more limited in what it's capable of too and it won't work with the dashcam/sentry mode either.
Personally, I'd go with the Model 3 over the used Model S.
Looking to buy a Tesla? Use my referral link and we both get credits
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |