![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
This is why I think it should be like Japan in some areas where you have to show you have a carpark to register a car. Too many clutter up the narrow roads around here and the council dont seem to give a crap about adding some no parking lines to stop it happening.
I think there’s some quite poor advice and unnecessary nastiness going on here.
If a ticket is issued for a car parked on the road with an expired WOF, IANAL but surely it would be a valid defence if the owner could demonstrate that a WOF was applied for prior to expiry date, that the car failed and they were waiting for parts - and not using the car in the meantime.
Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.
eracode:
I think there’s some quite poor advice and unnecessary nastiness going on here.
If a ticket is issued for a car parked on the road with an expired WOF, IANAL but surely it would be a valid defence if the owner could demonstrate that a WOF was applied for prior to expiry date, that the car failed and they were waiting for parts - and not using the car in the meantime.
One would hope so...
eracode:
I think there’s some quite poor advice and unnecessary nastiness going on here.
If a ticket is issued for a car parked on the road with an expired WOF, IANAL but surely it would be a valid defence if the owner could demonstrate that a WOF was applied for prior to expiry date, that the car failed and they were waiting for parts - and not using the car in the meantime.
It'd be up to the police. The law is clear.
Handle9:
eracode:
I think there’s some quite poor advice and unnecessary nastiness going on here.
If a ticket is issued for a car parked on the road with an expired WOF, IANAL but surely it would be a valid defence if the owner could demonstrate that a WOF was applied for prior to expiry date, that the car failed and they were waiting for parts - and not using the car in the meantime.
It'd be up to the police. The law is clear.
I'm clearly not the only one who thinks that is asinine. Repetitively saying 'the law is the law' doesn't make a law sane or just. Also, if you're sure that that's what the law says, post a link the the relevant section of whatever act says that.
Handle9:
Okey dokey
IANAL, but that's only talking about registration and licencing, not WOF.
eracode:I think there’s some quite poor advice and unnecessary nastiness going on here.
If a ticket is issued for a car parked on the road with an expired WOF, IANAL but surely it would be a valid defence if the owner could demonstrate that a WOF was applied for prior to expiry date, that the car failed and they were waiting for parts - and not using the car in the meantime.
Aaron2222:Handle9:Okey dokey
IANAL, but that's only talking about registration and licencing, not WOF.
Aaron2222:
Handle9:
Okey dokey
IANAL, but that's only talking about registration and licencing, not WOF.
Yeah the acts and the regulations are all interconnected and all over the place. The governing law (as opposed to regulations) is:
https://www.legislation.govt.nz/regulation/public/2004/0427/latest/DLM303653.html
richms:
This is why I think it should be like Japan in some areas where you have to show you have a carpark to register a car. Too many clutter up the narrow roads around here and the council dont seem to give a crap about adding some no parking lines to stop it happening.
The problem with broken yellow lines, at least in Wellington, is that people ignore them and the council does no enforcement. There are cars all over the footpath here and the council don't care despite them saying a year ago that they were going to crack down on it.
People shouldn't be able to socialise the cost of storing their personal property.
Well, this discussion has taken a turn.
Each local authority (parking enforcement) is separate and may operate differently depending where you live. They are under no obligation to give any grace period, that's just a local policy.
Same with the police - they are under no obligation to provide a grace period
If your vehicle is on the road, then it must be road legal (WoF, Rego, Licence, and up to WoF standard). It doesn't matter if it is being driven or parked. "Road" is a legally defined term and includes a lot of places that most normal people wouldn't think of. Even some private property can be considered a "road" for enforcement purposes (not so much parking enforcement)
If your vehicle isn't road legal, then you are best to remove it completely from the road. Whether or not you have off-road parking is of no interest to regulatory authorities. You can ask for leniency, but they are under no obligation to provide any. As someone said earlier, "this is a you problem"...as blunt or upsetting that may be to some, it is the reality.
Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation
Aaron2222:
[What are you supposed to do if you don't have off-street parking?
I'd leave it at the dealer's premises. Make it a headache for them and they might be motivated to resolve the issue faster.
Mike
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |