Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Lizard1977

2060 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified

#286087 4-Jun-2021 16:47
Send private message

I did a search of the forums and there are several threads about Wilson Parking/PESNZ already, but many of them are quite old now.  So I'm looking for a little up-to-date advice here.

 

I regularly parked in a Wilson Parking site here in Palmerston North (a literal gravel pit) where the earlybird parking fee is $1/day, so rock-bottom in terms of prices.  I pay using the Parkmate app.

 

On the day in question, I parked and took out my phone, opened the app and went through all the way up to the point where I normally tap on the "start parking" button.  In this case, I think I must have mis-pressed the button, and just put it in my pocket without checking, being in a hurry.  It wasn't until I opened my phone a few hours later that I saw it still on the app, not activated.  I immediately went out to the car where the parking breach notice had been placed at 10.03am (2 hours after I parked, and right after the earlybird period ended).  I moved my car out of the carpark, and went online and paid for the earlybird rate, plus what I felt was a fair and reasonable charge for their administration - $5.  I then wrote to explain that I was appealing the breach notice, and that I had paid what I believed was a reasonable settlement, and considered the matter closed.  I've done this twice in the past 3 years, each case being a similar mistake, and in both cases they were waived.  Not this time though...

 

They wrote back a few weeks later to say that they didn't accept my explanation or my settlement, and insisted on payment.  I wrote back explaining that I didn't accept their insistence on payment, and re-affirmed my appeal.  I also explained that I was prepared to go to the Disputes Tribunal, and requested the necessary details to enable me to complete my DT claim form.  They wrote back this week saying that they still didn't accept my appeal, and claimed that all the necessary details for me to file my claim are on the back of the breach notice (I don't think they are).

 

So now I'm left in a bit of a dilemma - do I follow through on my threat to go to the DT, or not?  In my view, the charge they are levying ($65 + $20 for late payment) is excessive in relation to the daily charge of $1.  They claim this is because the cost to recover the lost revenue is high (i.e. they have to pay a person to clomp around the parking lot and print off tickets).  But I contend that any costs of checking compliance (i.e. their parking enforcement system) needs to be built into the ordinary parking charges, not the enforcement costs.  For instance, if there was 100% compliance (and no breach notices issued), they are still required to pay the costs of checking for compliance.  I argue that the cost of enforcement is the marginal cost for a person to stand in front of my car and confirm the details, and print the ticket and slide it under my windscreen wiper.  Maybe my assessment of $5 is too low, but $65 is clearly too high.

 

What do all the bush lawyers out there suggest I do?  Call their bluff and lodge the claim with the DT?  Any advice on constructing my argument in case it actually goes that far?  Or am I being childish here and should I pay the balance of their demand?  For the moment, I'm inclined to write a third letter and assert that they still haven't supplied the required details for the DT claim form, and insist that until they provide such details I will be unable to submit my claim and consider the matter closed until further notice.

 

 


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4


SirHumphreyAppleby
2844 posts

Uber Geek


  #2718390 4-Jun-2021 17:16
Send private message

I removed my previous comment as the common law remedy I mentioned related to clamping/towing.

 

They are claiming a loss which greatly exceeds any actual cost. If you had paid the $1, that's all they would have got had you stayed in the space as you would have been entitled to. Nobody else could use the space, so there is no loss to them.

 

While they may be entitled to recover costs, someone had to check parking compliance, and I consider your offer to pay $5 more than fair. In fact, it's $5 more than I would have offered to pay.

 

There may be costs associated with issuing the 'fine', such as obtaining vehicle ownership details, but they would only have done that in a non-payment situation. As you were communicating with them, there would have been no need for them to incur any additional fees.

 

Surely, it's up to them to pursue the costs? They're the ones who are claiming a loss, not you.


freitasm
BDFL - Memuneh
79254 posts

Uber Geek

Administrator
ID Verified
Trusted
Geekzone
Lifetime subscriber

  #2718400 4-Jun-2021 17:40
Send private message

Ping @nate





Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSyncBackblaze backup




nate
6473 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2718430 4-Jun-2021 18:47
Send private message

The reddit thread posted here has some great advice - I've done very similar in the past, and I have got off at least a handful of these fines.

 

Remember they can only go after you for actual losses suffered. I don't entertain the argument that the guard who had to write the "ticket" is directly correlated to what you did or didn't do, they were going to turn up regardless.

 

Write that third letter back, and if need be, go to disputes. If they threaten to pass the debt over to debt collectors, that's fine, the debt is in dispute and won't go anywhere. Stay calm and cool, they will try to ratchet up the pressure, and that's fine. They are trying to scare you into paying.

 

Finally, I don't think your being childish at all, you could end up saving yourself $85 :)

 

Good luck.


antonknee
1133 posts

Uber Geek


  #2718435 4-Jun-2021 18:56
Send private message

nate:

 

The reddit thread posted here has some great advice - I've done very similar in the past, and I have got off at least a handful of these fines.

 

Remember they can only go after you for actual losses suffered. I don't entertain the argument that the guard who had to write the "ticket" is directly correlated to what you did or didn't do, they were going to turn up regardless.

 

Write that third letter back, and if need be, go to disputes. If they threaten to pass the debt over to debt collectors, that's fine, the debt is in dispute and won't go anywhere. Stay calm and cool, they will try to ratchet up the pressure, and that's fine. They are trying to scare you into paying.

 

Finally, I don't think your being childish at all, you could end up saving yourself $85 :)

 

Good luck.

 

 

I 100% agree.

 

Lob the DT back at them, they probably won’t turn up if it even gets that far. I’ve been in your shoes and they acquiesced after my third letter threatening the DT. 


shk292
2853 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #2718448 4-Jun-2021 19:47
Send private message

Surely they need to take you to the DT, not vice versa?  As it stands, they have asked for money, you have refused and that's the end of it unless they take further action.

 

As mentioned above, any attempt to collect the "debt" would be invalid because it is disputed and you have the correspondence to prove it.

 

It might be slightly risky parking there again in the meantime though, they could clamp you or tow you


michaelmurfy
meow
13240 posts

Uber Geek

Moderator
ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2718457 4-Jun-2021 20:09
Send private message

The way I've approached this in the past is saying the debt is settled after paying them the losses and telling them the full amount requested from them however is under dispute due to the fact they can only claim for losses so they can't release the debt collectors on me - I've then told them as I consider this matter resolved if they wish to challenge it then they're welcome to take me to the disputes tribunal. Never heard from them after that.

 

I've also withheld my license plate details from third parties now on cars since that.





Michael Murphy | https://murfy.nz
Referral Links: Quic Broadband (use R122101E7CV7Q for free setup)

Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? Please consider supporting us by subscribing.
Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.


 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #2718464 4-Jun-2021 20:57
Send private message

michaelmurfy:


I've also withheld my license plate details from third parties now on cars since that.



You can't prevent them from seeing your details. The "make your details private" trick hasn't worked for a few years now. If they want your details they can just ask NZTA who now than likely will hand them over.

Scott3
3963 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #2718470 4-Jun-2021 21:37
Send private message

shk292:

 

Surely they need to take you to the DT, not vice versa?  As it stands, they have asked for money, you have refused and that's the end of it unless they take further action.

 

As mentioned above, any attempt to collect the "debt" would be invalid because it is disputed and you have the correspondence to prove it.

 

...

 

 

Yeah. I agree.

 

Parking enforcement services has claimed money is owed, OP has disputed it, and declined to meet their demands. If Parking Enforcement Services want to make their claim enforceable, it is them that need to take OP to the Disputes Tribunal. Unlikely that they will do so due to the flowing:

 

     

  1. Their claim is clearly punitive, something that is not permitted under NZ law in this situation, and OP has already compensated them for their losses by paying the carpark daily fee. 
  2. It costs them money to file with the disputes tribunal, and their employee's time to attend.
  3. They probiably don't want to risk stories getting in the media that they lost at the Tribunal.

Shadowfoot
First time caller
385 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2720051 6-Jun-2021 22:29
Send private message

Could Wilson decide to either clamp your car, or have it towed if they see you have revoked authorised access?

 

It seems safer to use the option of sending them the letters. 





Scott3
3963 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #2720059 6-Jun-2021 23:22
Send private message

Shadowfoot:

 

Could Wilson decide to either clamp your car, or have it towed if they see you have revoked authorised access?

 

It seems safer to use the option of sending them the letters. 

 

 

I imagine they would if you revoked access to details, and the repeatedly parked without paying.

 

But only to deal with the non-payment at the time they clamp / tow. I don't think they have any way of knowing if the car has been changed ownership between that and yesterday.

 

And I think the courts would look very dimly on a company clamping or towing cars on days that they had paid correctly in order to chase up alleged debts.

 

 

 

Partner forgot to pay at a wilsons carpark once and got a punitive ticked stuck under the wiper. We had revoked access to details prior, and made the decision to just ignore it, as any meaningful communication would have required disclosing our identity. Frequently used that same carpark (making sure to correctly pay) for some years afterwards without issue. Upgraded that car about 6 months ago.


timmmay
20575 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #2720063 7-Jun-2021 06:35
Send private message

I tried the advice in the thread a couple of years back, didn't work. Couldn't be bothered, just paid it. Pack of wan**** Wilson, no point appealing to them in any way. Either go to DT or pay it IMHO.


CokemonZ
1051 posts

Uber Geek


  #2720171 7-Jun-2021 14:31
Send private message

I have used the advice previously, wrote the letter and paid about $7 and it worked. However I did have some shopping receipts to back up that I was there legitimately.

I reckon it's started to become common enough they are going to be a bit more aggressive.

shk292
2853 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #2720292 7-Jun-2021 16:41
Send private message

timmmay:

 

I tried the advice in the thread a couple of years back, didn't work. Couldn't be bothered, just paid it. Pack of wan**** Wilson, no point appealing to them in any way. Either go to DT or pay it IMHO.

 

 

How did it not work?  Did they take you to DT or did you just cave in and pay anyway?


elpenguino
3419 posts

Uber Geek


  #2720296 7-Jun-2021 16:49
Send private message

Hong Kong based Wilson are indeed a pack of w***ers. Anybody who takes them on gets my full support.

 

Years ago they sent me a letter demanding a fine, alleging I had overparked at the hospital.

 

Turned out I was sitting at home sending emails at that exact time although I had been at the hospital earlier (thank you to time stamped emails) so they got told to get knotted.

 

If you try it on 100 people then a certain percentage will pay.

 

Cynical practices like this are one reason why the company is so despised.





Most of the posters in this thread are just like chimpanzees on MDMA, full of feelings of bonhomie, joy, and optimism. Fred99 8/4/21


 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.