![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” -John Kenneth Galbraith
rb99
rugrat: Looks like in UK they can't increase price under contract, unless it mentions time of year and how much going up by in contract, eg rate of inflation.
http://www.broadbandchoices.co.uk/guides/help/cancel-contract-price-goes-up
Here in NZ though looks like they can put in contract whatever they like, as can't find any links on price increase while in contract in consumer pages, and the consumer gets no say what's in a companys contract in general.
I think VF contracts let them up the price when they like, but unlike spark have chosen not to up the price of people on contract.
Nothing you can do but wait till your contract up and then see if better deal around, as probably not worth the disconnect fee.
plambrechtsen: The increases were fairly widely talked about after the commerce commission announcement.
The contract term effective covers the cost of installation and the router. You are free to move to any plan while under contract.
I don't work in the retail space so have no control over pricing or any of that. But I hope after 12 months you will enjoy the excellent speeds and low latency on spark ufb.
dafman:plambrechtsen: The increases were fairly widely talked about after the commerce commission announcement.
The contract term effective covers the cost of installation and the router. You are free to move to any plan while under contract.
I don't work in the retail space so have no control over pricing or any of that. But I hope after 12 months you will enjoy the excellent speeds and low latency on spark ufb.
Zero chance I'll stay with Spark at contract expiry.
rb99: Think that applies to pretty much any ISP out there - these are our terms, take it or leave it. I mean has anyone ever seen an ISP contract with a 'These are our terms, please insert your terms in the space provided below' item in it.
Does anyone know how enforceable these contracts are, given the one-sidedness, or must we all rely on them being 'reasonable' with their pricing.
(and yes I'm sure I wouldn't be making these comments if this thread was about a price drop)
graemeh:rb99: Think that applies to pretty much any ISP out there - these are our terms, take it or leave it. I mean has anyone ever seen an ISP contract with a 'These are our terms, please insert your terms in the space provided below' item in it.
Does anyone know how enforceable these contracts are, given the one-sidedness, or must we all rely on them being 'reasonable' with their pricing.
(and yes I'm sure I wouldn't be making these comments if this thread was about a price drop)
I doubt it has ever been tested.
You could take it to the disputes tribunal but for $48 a year it is not worth the bother.
It is looking like this sort of price increase within a contract term will be illegal in any contracts from 18 March 2015.
You can find the full details here (download the PDF): http://www.comcom.govt.nz/fair-trading/guidelines/draft-unfair-contract-term-guidelines/
graemeh:rb99: Think that applies to pretty much any ISP out there - these are our terms, take it or leave it. I mean has anyone ever seen an ISP contract with a 'These are our terms, please insert your terms in the space provided below' item in it.
Does anyone know how enforceable these contracts are, given the one-sidedness, or must we all rely on them being 'reasonable' with their pricing.
(and yes I'm sure I wouldn't be making these comments if this thread was about a price drop)
I doubt it has ever been tested.
You could take it to the disputes tribunal but for $48 a year it is not worth the bother.
It is looking like this sort of price increase within a contract term will be illegal in any contracts from 18 March 2015.
You can find the full details here (download the PDF): http://www.comcom.govt.nz/fair-trading/guidelines/draft-unfair-contract-term-guidelines/
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” -John Kenneth Galbraith
rb99
dafman:graemeh:rb99: Think that applies to pretty much any ISP out there - these are our terms, take it or leave it. I mean has anyone ever seen an ISP contract with a 'These are our terms, please insert your terms in the space provided below' item in it.
Does anyone know how enforceable these contracts are, given the one-sidedness, or must we all rely on them being 'reasonable' with their pricing.
(and yes I'm sure I wouldn't be making these comments if this thread was about a price drop)
I doubt it has ever been tested.
You could take it to the disputes tribunal but for $48 a year it is not worth the bother.
It is looking like this sort of price increase within a contract term will be illegal in any contracts from 18 March 2015.
You can find the full details here (download the PDF): http://www.comcom.govt.nz/fair-trading/guidelines/draft-unfair-contract-term-guidelines/
For the record, I didn't create this thread over $48, I did so on the basis of principle. Essentially, there has (certainly from my perspective) been a fundamental breach of good faith from Spark. They offered a 12-month contract with a fixed monthly price, I accepted their offer, formalised this via a contract, only to find they reneged on the agreed pricing before we had even reached the end of the second month. And their response? - read the fine print!
rb99:graemeh:rb99: Think that applies to pretty much any ISP out there - these are our terms, take it or leave it. I mean has anyone ever seen an ISP contract with a 'These are our terms, please insert your terms in the space provided below' item in it.
Does anyone know how enforceable these contracts are, given the one-sidedness, or must we all rely on them being 'reasonable' with their pricing.
(and yes I'm sure I wouldn't be making these comments if this thread was about a price drop)
I doubt it has ever been tested.
You could take it to the disputes tribunal but for $48 a year it is not worth the bother.
It is looking like this sort of price increase within a contract term will be illegal in any contracts from 18 March 2015.
You can find the full details here (download the PDF): http://www.comcom.govt.nz/fair-trading/guidelines/draft-unfair-contract-term-guidelines/
After a very quick look, point 67 look quite promising, will have to have a proper look later - the legalise doesn't look to bad.
Must admit though I've just signed up to MyRepublic on their 12 month contract (with the 3 month trial) so I'll just see how that goes for a while. I probably wouldn't be to bothered with a small increase - though a unilateral $20 increase would be different.
Hope I'm not putting words in the OP's mouth (or just being rude in general) if I suggest it might be the lack of any obvious warning about the increase and its suddenness that's bothering him, more than the actual amount.
graemeh:rb99:graemeh:rb99: Think that applies to pretty much any ISP out there - these are our terms, take it or leave it. I mean has anyone ever seen an ISP contract with a 'These are our terms, please insert your terms in the space provided below' item in it.
Does anyone know how enforceable these contracts are, given the one-sidedness, or must we all rely on them being 'reasonable' with their pricing.
(and yes I'm sure I wouldn't be making these comments if this thread was about a price drop)
I doubt it has ever been tested.
You could take it to the disputes tribunal but for $48 a year it is not worth the bother.
It is looking like this sort of price increase within a contract term will be illegal in any contracts from 18 March 2015.
You can find the full details here (download the PDF): http://www.comcom.govt.nz/fair-trading/guidelines/draft-unfair-contract-term-guidelines/
After a very quick look, point 67 look quite promising, will have to have a proper look later - the legalise doesn't look to bad.
Must admit though I've just signed up to MyRepublic on their 12 month contract (with the 3 month trial) so I'll just see how that goes for a while. I probably wouldn't be to bothered with a small increase - though a unilateral $20 increase would be different.
Hope I'm not putting words in the OP's mouth (or just being rude in general) if I suggest it might be the lack of any obvious warning about the increase and its suddenness that's bothering him, more than the actual amount.
It will be interesting to see how this changes Telco contracts.
“The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.” -John Kenneth Galbraith
rb99
dafman: For the record, I didn't create this thread over $48, I did so on the basis of principle. Essentially, there has (certainly from my perspective) been a fundamental breach of good faith from Spark. They offered a 12-month contract with a fixed monthly price, I accepted their offer, formalised this via a contract, only to find they reneged on the agreed pricing before we had even reached the end of the second month. And their response? - read the fine print!
plambrechtsen: I think this is where the confusion is coming from.
You can change to any available plan while in the 12 month contract or add and remove services. Such as you can move from Unlimited to the 40GB plan or from the capped (and thus throttled) or overage plan once per month while under contract. So you can change the fixed monthly price and thus how much you pay while in the 12 month contract.
The contract term applies to offset the costs Spark are charged by Chorus from connecting broadband to your house and the modem supplied to you, not the certain plan and thus monthly costs you are incurring.
Home: Work:
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |