plambrechtsen:dafman: For the record, I didn't create this thread over $48, I did so on the basis of principle. Essentially, there has (certainly from my perspective) been a fundamental breach of good faith from Spark. They offered a 12-month contract with a fixed monthly price, I accepted their offer, formalised this via a contract, only to find they reneged on the agreed pricing before we had even reached the end of the second month. And their response? - read the fine print!
I think this is where the confusion is coming from.
You can change to any available plan while in the 12 month contract or add and remove services. Such as you can move from Unlimited to the 40GB plan or from the capped (and thus throttled) or overage plan once per month while under contract. So you can change the fixed monthly price and thus how much you pay while in the 12 month contract.
The contract term applies to offset the costs Spark are charged by Chorus from connecting broadband to your house and the modem supplied to you, not the certain plan and thus monthly costs you are incurring.
There is no confusion. Let's be clear, from a consumer perspective, the MAIN determining factor when signing up to a 12 month telecom contract is the price you will pay over that contract term. Or put another way, who in their right mind would sign up to a 12 month term, and agree to financial penalties to leave early, if they have no idea what price they will ultimately be charged for the service they have just locked in? Spark advertised on the basis of price, and if that price is variable and completely at their discretion, this should be made clear at the point of contracting, not buried deep in the fine print of lengthy terms and conditions. This is just Spark - it looks like Vodafone honour pricing during contractual period (correct me if otherwise).
I'm pretty busy at work at the moment, but seriously considering taking this through to formal dispute resolution. As I said earlier, it's not the $48, it's the principle of a commercial entity operating under unfair commercial practice.