![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
ninjabear: Problem is they want a phone in their bedroom while the vfx is in the lounge....
I guess you could use a cordless phone but if only the base for the phone can be say used in the existing phone line in their room.
Imagine you have a two storey house and the vfx linksys device is downstairs and your room was up stairs.I suppose if you hear the phone ring in the morning you will need to run downstairs probably trip over and fall down a few steps on the stairs as you haven't fully wake up yet.lol
I wonder if there is a wireless landline phone where it can communicate with a wireless device thats plugs into the the back of the pap2t and the base for the cordless phone can be situated in any place around the house
I think its a bit inconveient to have a vfx line with only 1 phone being plugged in.Even with the adaptor you suggested its a bit of a hassle lining up 3 phones next to the vfx as well as the modem next to it..
A bit ... unrealistic???
jesterpaul: I do find it disappointing that Xnet don't tell you the SIP server settings. I have VoIP hardware, now I learn that I'l need to buy more because of this. I'd be intersted if anybody has experienced a comparison between Slingshot iTalk, and the Xnet VFX service. Is it really superior in clarity?
I found iTalk to be a little poor on a 2MB connection some years back.
Anyone have any comments on this? I guess I'm wondering whether the hardware lock in has any benefit other than to the Linksys Xnet relationship.
I'd really love one of you Xnet reps to comment on this. I'm not trying to moan. My mind's open about it, but as yet I'm not seeing what benefit there is to the customer from this policy.
jesterpaul: I do find it disappointing that Xnet don't tell you the SIP server settings. I have VoIP hardware, now I learn that I'l need to buy more because of this. I'd be intersted if anybody has experienced a comparison between Slingshot iTalk, and the Xnet VFX service. Is it really superior in clarity?
I found iTalk to be a little poor on a 2MB connection some years back.
Anyone have any comments on this? I guess I'm wondering whether the hardware lock in has any benefit other than to the Linksys Xnet relationship.
I'd really love one of you Xnet reps to comment on this. I'm not trying to moan. My mind's open about it, but as yet I'm not seeing what benefit there is to the customer from this policy.
jesterpaul: I'd be intersted if anybody has experienced a comparison between Slingshot iTalk, and the Xnet VFX service. Is it really superior in clarity?
I found iTalk to be a little poor on a 2MB connection some years back.
Anyone have any comments on this? I guess I'm wondering whether the hardware lock in has any benefit other than to the Linksys Xnet relationship.
jesterpaul: I do find it disappointing that Xnet don't tell you the SIP server settings. I have VoIP hardware, now I learn that I'l need to buy more because of this. I'd be intersted if anybody has experienced a comparison between Slingshot iTalk, and the Xnet VFX service. Is it really superior in clarity?
I found iTalk to be a little poor on a 2MB connection some years back.
Anyone have any comments on this? I guess I'm wondering whether the hardware lock in has any benefit other than to the Linksys Xnet relationship.
I'd really love one of you Xnet reps to comment on this. I'm not trying to moan. My mind's open about it, but as yet I'm not seeing what benefit there is to the customer from this policy.
exportgoldman: There were two main VOIP providers we looked at a year ago, italk or 2talk and XNET, the first one allowed you to plug anything into their VOIP server, and configure everything yourself. It led to massive support problems and a huge range of configurations and hardware configurations and inconsistant quality.
kfella2000:
With a DECT cordless phone system there is only one base unit hooks up to the phoneline the additional units run off the main base unit. So why not get a DECT system with say 3 phones, plug the main unit into the PAP2T. The base units for the other 2 phones are just chargers to keep the batteries charged. Then these other 2 units could be placed anywhere in the house even upstairs and then you dont even have to worry about the other phone jacks around the house and also no running downstairs and tripping over things either. I have that system here where I have the base unit in my bedroom hooked up to the PAP2T and my son has a second unit in his bedroom up the far end of the house and it works fine.
richms: Except the range of dect aint all that hot. The dect standard really dropped the ball with its support for repeaters being as bad as it is because in anything other then a 3 bedroom townhouse or an apartment either a repeater or more then one base station is pretty much essential, just as a single wireless accesspoint will not cover a complete house and section, neither wil dect.
grant_k:richms: Except the range of dect aint all that hot. The dect standard really dropped the ball with its support for repeaters being as bad as it is because in anything other then a 3 bedroom townhouse or an apartment either a repeater or more then one base station is pretty much essential, just as a single wireless accesspoint will not cover a complete house and section, neither wil dect.
Ahhh, not really...
It depends which DECT phones you are talking about. I have a Uniden 5.8GHz system and just the one base covers everywhere inside one (admittedly small) house but also up to about 100 metres from the house in all directions. In fact, if I stand on a nearby hilltop about 200 metres away, the call quality is crystal clear
You can never have enough Volvos!
ninjabear: I advised my friend to buy one of those you meantion 1 base with multiple handset so she bought a uniden
It seems thru the telecom line or the vfx line the phone makes a soft fuzzy sound
I just don't know why??
ninjabear: It was a 5.8ghz model was dss7815
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |