![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Technofreak:
Then they wouldn't have anything to tell you.
And that’s another thing that annoys me. When a reporter prefaces their report with “What I can tell you,……” If you can’t tell us, there is nothing to report.
“We’ve arranged a society based on science and technology, in which nobody understands anything about science technology. Carl Sagan 1996
Dingbatt:
Technofreak:
Then they wouldn't have anything to tell you.
And that’s another thing that annoys me. When a reporter prefaces their report with “What I can tell you,……” If you can’t tell us, there is nothing to report.
It also makes the presumption that they are smarter/more knowledge than you are.
Just report the news FFS don't try and be an expert on stuff you really don't understand.
Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5
eracode:
NZH today: "Ian Foster reveals what went wrong against Ireland".Reveals? It wasn't really any secret, was it.
Was he bound up or they were sure he was bound to be found?
"The Manawatu Cricket Association has confirmed a man who attended his club training on Tuesday evening has [Covid]."
While it's probably true, that's hardly an authoritative source. Was it that hard to ask the MoH before publishing?
Dingbatt:
Technofreak:
Then they wouldn't have anything to tell you.
And that’s another thing that annoys me. When a reporter prefaces their report with “What I can tell you,……” If you can’t tell us, there is nothing to report.
... and when those reporters cook up contrived puns and metaphors to go with the video in their report. Yes it's good now and then (and is sometimes clever) - but in every story, every night it becomes tedious. One News is particularly bad at this.
Sometimes I just sit and think. Other times I just sit.
That doesn't actually seem too bad to me. There's a bit of poetic licence ("around 100" would be much more straightforward) but it still gets the point across.
Behodar:That doesn't actually seem too bad to me. There's a bit of poetic licence ("around 100" would be much more straightforward) but it still gets the point across.
We seem to be interpreting things differently. You appear to be reading it as "around 8 callouts" and I'm reading "around 8 dozen callouts" (i.e. 96). Who knows which is correct...
Behodar:
We seem to be interpreting things differently. You appear to be reading it as "around 8 callouts" and I'm reading "around 8 dozen callouts" (i.e. 96). Who knows which is correct...
surprised they didn't write "..up to 1000"
Matthew
Behodar:
We seem to be interpreting things differently. You appear to be reading it as "around 8 callouts" and I'm reading "around 8 dozen callouts" (i.e. 96). Who knows which is correct...
I'd be inclined to think they were meaning eight total. It's rare foo anyone to specify the number of dozens these days. Dozens is often used as an expression of many without any thought as to what a dozen actually is. Sadly I think if you were to ask some people how many items there are in a dozen I think you'd get a blank look or a stupid answer.
Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5
1024kb: From the Radio New Zealand website this morning comes this clanger:
"He started asking around and found out there had been dozens of police call-outs - somewhere in the vicinity of eight - to the property."
@ any journalists / editors who happen to be reading this thread. Please, please quit. You're utterly useless, the whole lot of you. Give it up, it's time to let someone - anyone - else have a go.
gzt:1024kb: From the Radio New Zealand website this morning comes this clanger:
"He started asking around and found out there had been dozens of police call-outs - somewhere in the vicinity of eight - to the property."
@ any journalists / editors who happen to be reading this thread. Please, please quit. You're utterly useless, the whole lot of you. Give it up, it's time to let someone - anyone - else have a go.
The reporter is summarizing a response from an interview subject. Your problem is with the person who said it not the reporter.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |