Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Bung
6489 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #838820 18-Jun-2013 18:13
Send private message

Dratsab:Going back at least 4 years when I used to run briefings involving a number of different branches of council, the way it worked was the council contracted ADT Security (who operate the Parkwise brand) for warden duties. ADT are paid an agreed contract amount for this and the wardens are in turn paid by ADT.

When "caught out" by police for expired WOF/Licence label you may only get a warning, as you say, but that will depend on a number of factors. If you are ticketed and the expiry is only recent, say within a few weeks, you will generally be given a grace period (called compliance) in which to correct the problem and present evidence of its being corrected. Upon presentation of the required evidence within the required timeframe the fine will then be waived. You'll get no such joy from the council.


I don't know which council you are referring to but Wellington " contracts Tenix Solutions who subcontract Parkwise (a subsidiary of Armourguard) to monitor parking in the city.".

I see contracts and subcontracts as more clips out of the same ticket so there is less incentive to waive fines. The council does share in the fine revenue.

Wellington claims (I have no idea whether this is true)
"Council spokesman Richard MacLean said there had been a slight decline in the number of tickets issued over the past three years.

Motorists were given a month's grace period before being issued a ticket, he said.

"If the vehicle was seen on a public road during this time they would be given a caution notice as a reminder to get the vehicle legal.

"This looks like a ticket, but has no monetary penalty," he said." Dec 2012.

Other councils have grace periods. The Police are just as likely to issue a ticket that their back office refuse to waive as any council.



SaltyNZ
8232 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
2degrees
Lifetime subscriber

  #838854 18-Jun-2013 19:07
Send private message

That's exactly why I believe OP should object. We have here a situation where multiple for-profit companies have a financial incentive to issue as many legally enforced penalties as they can as fast as they can, with absolutely no accountability to be accurate.

If I'm going to be paying a fine I want to feel certain that

a) The ticket is accurate - I don't think it's unreasonable to insist that I actually be guilty of the offence I'm accused of; and
b) The fine is used for the public benefit, not to line the pockets of shareholders





iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


Dratsab
3946 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #839028 18-Jun-2013 23:46
Send private message

Bung: I don't know which council you are referring to but Wellington "contracts Tenix Solutions who subcontract Parkwise (a subsidiary of Armourguard) to monitor parking in the city" 

We're getting miles off topic here, but I am referring to Wellington City Council. ADT Armourguard is the correct name of the subcontractor - I used a short form through habit. They're owned by the multinational Tyco.



Klipspringer
2385 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #840032 20-Jun-2013 08:48
Send private message

Slightly off topic.

Here is a vehicle license disc in South Africa. The red part is the Window sticker which you stick to the inside of your window which holds the disc in place. You can buy them with all sorts of messages. 



Maybe a good idea for the parking wardens in NZ. But a different message.



SaltyNZ
8232 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
2degrees
Lifetime subscriber

  #840070 20-Jun-2013 09:20
Send private message

Klipspringer: 

Maybe a good idea for the parking wardens in NZ. But a different message.



Seems perfectly appropriate to me.




iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


Bung
6489 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #840145 20-Jun-2013 10:59
Send private message

The message has to go direct to the council and councillors rather than someone who is outsourced.

The outcry over the Wellington parking camera car is an example.

Wheelbarrow01

1725 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Chorus

  #841192 21-Jun-2013 17:34
Send private message

So.....

Two days ago I sent an email to the council politely requesting all proof - photographic or otherwise - of the alleged offence. I advised that I intended to prove I was not parked in Conway Street as was alleged on the ticket.

I received the following response today:

"Thank you for the information supplied regarding the above infringement notice.
As a consequence, this Council's records have been amended accordingly and the notice is cancelled.
Thank you for your assistance."

The only information I supplied was that neither I nor my vehicle had ever been to Conway Street during my lifetime.

The lesson here is that it does not matter whether you committed an offence, what matters is whether you committed the offence you are accused of as stated on the ticket.

 
 
 

Move to New Zealand's best fibre broadband service (affiliate link). Free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE. Note that to use Quic Broadband you must be comfortable with configuring your own router.
geek4me
843 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #841850 23-Jun-2013 09:06
Send private message

I once got a ticket for doing 102 on the motorway in a Hillman Avenger, the limit was 80 back then. The officer issuing the ticket asked if my car was an Avenger, he couldn't be bothered checking, I said nothing, I was driving a Hillman Minx (great teenage car in its day). I wrote in to say I do not own an Avenger and the ticket was waived. So you did the right thing - if there is any error on the ticket write in and it may be cancelled.

scuwp
3885 posts

Uber Geek


  #841855 23-Jun-2013 09:16
Send private message

So I guess the moral of the story is that breaking the law is ok, it's the authorities to blame for getting it wrong? Hmmm, what a screwed up sense of morals some seem to have.




Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation



Xile
155 posts

Master Geek

ID Verified

  #841863 23-Jun-2013 09:43
Send private message

Wheelbarrow01:
The lesson here is that it does not matter whether you committed an offence, what matters is whether you committed the offence you are accused of as stated on the ticket.


Wrong. The lesson here is that you should have a currently licensed vehicle before you use it on a road. You wouldn't have been in this situation and we wouldn't have had this thread if you had done that.

StarBlazer
961 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

#841865 23-Jun-2013 09:45
Send private message

geek4me: So you did the right thing.

Sorry - it's not "the right thing". 

Well done for breaking the law and getting away with it on a technicality!  Personally, I don't think it's anything to be proud of.




Procrastination eventually pays off.


Goosey
2834 posts

Uber Geek

Subscriber

  #841866 23-Jun-2013 09:45
Send private message

So....
1) have you paid your rego? (because we dont want to be seeing another topic called 'am i insured if I dont have a current rego and wof).

2) They way I see it, the parking warden 'could' have been nice and wanted to you 'get off' on your own doing given you were not being stung for an actual parking duration infringment.

3) you cant blame your wife for anything car related... 'this is from the man saftey code'.

SaltyNZ
8232 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
2degrees
Lifetime subscriber

  #841888 23-Jun-2013 10:24
Send private message

scuwp: So I guess the moral of the story is that breaking the law is ok, it's the authorities to blame for getting it wrong? Hmmm, what a screwed up sense of morals some seem to have.


No, the moral is that it is basic justice to expect to be guilty of the crime you're accused of. Letting it slide seems like a little thing, especially in this case, but it leads to places we don't want to go. There is nothing wrong with holding those who have power over you to a higher standard than you would hold yourself. Anybody who feels that they could not stand up to that kind of scrutiny can at any time feel free not to be in the police, the government, or a parking warden.

EDIT: I accidentally a word.




iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


scuwp
3885 posts

Uber Geek


  #841911 23-Jun-2013 12:05
Send private message

SaltyNZ:
scuwp: So I guess the moral of the story is that breaking the law is ok, it's the authorities to blame for getting it wrong? Hmmm, what a screwed up sense of morals some seem to have.


No, the moral is that it is basic justice to expect to be guilty of the crime you're accused of. Letting it slide seems like a little thing, especially in this case, but it leads to places we don't want to go. There is nothing wrong with holding those who have power over you to a higher standard than you would hold yourself. Anybody who feels that they could not stand up to that kind of scrutiny can at any time feel free not to be in the police, the government, or a parking warden.

EDIT: I accidentally a word.


Yes, but we have 3 pages of comments discussing what really was nothing more that a 'technicality'.  OP admits their 'guilt'.  The car was on a road without a valid licence to be there, end of story, or at least it should have been.  There is a big difference between being found 'not guilty' or being let off a ticket, especially on a silly technicality, and actually being 'innocent' of the charge.   I agree to holding authorities to account but in this case the offence was patently committed, and the OP was nothing more than lucky.    




Lazy is such an ugly word, I prefer to call it selective participation



SaltyNZ
8232 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
2degrees
Lifetime subscriber

  #841915 23-Jun-2013 12:16
Send private message

scuwp:
SaltyNZ:
scuwp: So I guess the moral of the story is that breaking the law is ok, it's the authorities to blame for getting it wrong? Hmmm, what a screwed up sense of morals some seem to have.


No, the moral is that it is basic justice to expect to be guilty of the crime you're accused of. Letting it slide seems like a little thing, especially in this case, but it leads to places we don't want to go. There is nothing wrong with holding those who have power over you to a higher standard than you would hold yourself. Anybody who feels that they could not stand up to that kind of scrutiny can at any time feel free not to be in the police, the government, or a parking warden.

EDIT: I accidentally a word.


Yes, but we have 3 pages of comments discussing what really was nothing more that a 'technicality'.  OP admits their 'guilt'.  The car was on a road without a valid licence to be there, end of story, or at least it should have been.  There is a big difference between being found 'not guilty' or being let off a ticket, especially on a silly technicality, and actually being 'innocent' of the charge.   I agree to holding authorities to account but in this case the offence was patently committed, and the OP was nothing more than lucky.    


Sure, if the council had come back with 'Thanks for pointing out our mistake. Your amended ticket is enclosed. You have 28 days to pay' then that would be completely different. Technicalities are the only protection you have against abuse, be it lazy, stupid, malicious or all of the above. They really are there for a reason.




iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!

 

These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.


1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.