![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Keep calm, and carry on posting.
Referral Links: Sharesies - Backblaze -
Are you happy with what you get from Geekzone? If so, please consider supporting us by subscribing.
No matter where you go, there you are.
Good idea, but that's for when I own my own place. While I'm renting I probably wouldn't do it.
Based on what I have seen around here, if you put a lock on your mailbox they just try harder to get into it and ruin it more.
Also doesn't help with parcels which is about 95% of what goes thru my PO Box.
For a while I was returning anything that was posted to me after scanning it, I printed some stickers telling the sender that it could have been an email. Many got the message but some like GEM visa still insist on posting things. If you change your limit they will even post a letter to the physical address which I complained about the first time it happened but they seem to thing its some legal requirement or some BS.
pchs:
Bunning's checkouts - extremely slow and inefficient POS systems. also the security check and old fashioned stamping of the receipt at the door is somewhat archaic.
How would you think they would stop someone coming in and picking up the same items and presenting the same receipt to the door guy for a second go around getting the same things?
Idiots who install a High Powered Wireless Outdoor Repeater on their chimney, (In a residential neighbourhood) AND NOT SECURED - ie: Totally open to anyone!
Geez, wireless around here is cluttered to begin with!
Hope they are on an unlimited plan!
(Their ISP doesn't deserve any "bill shock" media grief!)
Reading an article with "cubical" instead of "cubicle" or an IT person writing "Principle" instead of "Principal". A bit like "calender" instead of "calendar"...
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
Or "there" instead of "their", "your" instead of "you're"...and so forth...irritates me too.
Geektastic:
blakamin:
People using "speaker" mode on their phone in public places.
I've had 2 in the last week, in a cafe and a queue at a wildlife park*.
They usually get the hint when I get closer and start speaking loudly..
Something along the lines of "what sort rude f***ng pr**k would use f****ng speaker phone in a public effing place"... loud enough for the person on the other end of the phone to hear me and say something.
(*there were no kids around, I was lining up to pay for something).
You should be allowed to disphone such people and destroy the offending handset in return for a cash reward. Likewise people who walk along playing music on their phone over the speaker...
Yesterday I was at Dawson Falls, 900 metres up on Mt Taranaki and at the base of the falls was a group of people with a bluetooth speaker blaring away while they sat and sunbathed on the rocks. Talk about destroying the peace and solitude of a National Park...
Jetskis, or more specifically those riding them who think it is cool/clever to roar around in circles close to anchored boats in what would otherwise be a nice sheltered spot for a swim and lunch stop
Anyone who thinks petrol is too expensive needs to witness these idiots mindlessly burning it just to create noise and nuisance
This may (or may not) seem odd, but I am increasingly annoyed by the preponderance of video and audio links on news and information sites. I have long been annoyed by amateur 'instruction' YouTube videos, but this is also increasingly taking over sites like CNN and RNZ. I am comfortable using computers and playing media files if I have to and they have a legitimate place, but I grew up in the 1950s and I grew up reading newspapers and magazines. That is how I like to receive my information. I don't want to have to listen to podcasts or watch videos. They appeal to different parts of the brain, or in some cases, no brain at all. I prefer to read. I enjoy reading. I absorb information better through reading. I can skim and skip over the boring parts, or the stuff I already know, when reading. But increasingly, items that interest me are not presented in written form at all. If I want the information, I have to endure droning voices and coughs and splutters and all the other white noise that goes with non-written communications. This really annoys me.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Rikkitic:
This may (or may not) seem odd, but I am increasingly annoyed by the preponderance of video and audio links on news and information sites. I have long been annoyed by amateur 'instruction' YouTube videos, but this is also increasingly taking over sites like CNN and RNZ. I am comfortable using computers and playing media files if I have to and they have a legitimate place, but I grew up in the 1950s and I grew up reading newspapers and magazines. That is how I like to receive my information. I don't want to have to listen to podcasts or watch videos. They appeal to different parts of the brain, or in some cases, no brain at all. I prefer to read. I enjoy reading. I absorb information better through reading. I can skim and skip over the boring parts, or the stuff I already know, when reading. But increasingly, items that interest me are not presented in written form at all. If I want the information, I have to endure droning voices and coughs and splutters and all the other white noise that goes with non-written communications. This really annoys me.
Which is interesting, because whilst I have no time for junk instructional video's, I am a visual person. If I can watch someone do something, I'll get it much faster (usually) than reading the concept in a book. I suspect over time, more people have become accustomed to the visual learning method hence it's increasing prevalance.
That is interesting. Maybe it has to do with what you grew up with. I guess different people's brains work in different ways.
Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos
Having parcels "signed for by 3457", which is slightly better than the parcel apparently signed for by me and delivered 24 hours after it was "delivered".
Blue Sky: shadowfoot.bsky.social
networkn: Which is interesting, because whilst I have no time for junk instructional video's, I am a visual person. If I can watch someone do something, I'll get it much faster (usually) than reading the concept in a book. I suspect over time, more people have become accustomed to the visual learning method hence it's increasing prevalance.
I find that it depends on the subject. If it's something that I'm pretty familiar with, like a computer, then reading "click this, this and this" is much more tolerable than a video doing the same thing. On the other hand, if it's a subject that I'm not so familiar with then a video can be useful.
As for news, I like to read it while listening to music, and I'm not going to stop my music to listen to news.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |