![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
eXDee:
It would be nice for the end user if this was the case, but if they did then people would shout about the government stepping on peoples toes and getting all up in their property blah blah etc. If the landlords/bodycorp didn't like it, im sure the govt wouldn't be too pleased about losing favour with them.
Theres probably other aspects of it too, but yes as an end user i also wish there were less hoops to jump through.
richms: I think chorus should just stop new copper installs in fiber areas.
eXDee:TeaLeaf:eXDee: how fibre isn't classified as a utility like phone lines are under the RMA.
there is lies the problem with spending so much on UFB that people in built up areas cant access. it should be mandatory to replace the copper technology where its been layed, like having power or a telephone line. imo..
It would be nice for the end user if this was the case, but if they did then people would shout about the government stepping on peoples toes and getting all up in their property blah blah etc. If the landlords/bodycorp didn't like it, im sure the govt wouldn't be too pleased about losing favour with them.
Theres probably other aspects of it too, but yes as an end user i also wish there were less hoops to jump through.
richms: Huge cost on every copper install that doesn't work properly because the copper is beyond end of life and was in most cases only installed with the intention of providing 2 meg primary rate ISDN service on them at fastest.
... rather than being corroded, held together with bits of tape and bodged up 70's era junctions etc.
richms: I think chorus should just stop new copper installs in fiber areas.
"Sorry, you cant order that copper product, you are in a UFB area" would hopefully get these useless body corps and busybody objectors out of the way when they find they cant get a phone connected now.
Jaxar:eXDee:TeaLeaf:eXDee: how fibre isn't classified as a utility like phone lines are under the RMA.
there is lies the problem with spending so much on UFB that people in built up areas cant access. it should be mandatory to replace the copper technology where its been layed, like having power or a telephone line. imo..
It would be nice for the end user if this was the case, but if they did then people would shout about the government stepping on peoples toes and getting all up in their property blah blah etc. If the landlords/bodycorp didn't like it, im sure the govt wouldn't be too pleased about losing favour with them.
Theres probably other aspects of it too, but yes as an end user i also wish there were less hoops to jump through.
It would not be nice for the end user. It would be chaos.
Don't get me wrong fibre is great but it is not a solution for everybody. Thousands of PBX's for businesses would suddenly become obsolete. Thousands of monitored alarms both medical and security which are analogue only would become obsolete. Thousands of fax machines would no longer work. While there are solutions to each one of those problems imagine them hitting all at the rate that fibre is being introduced. Thousands of out of date analog only eftpos machines would no longer. All those houses and business that do not need internet but just a single POTS line would suddenly need to organise VOIP services.
I regularly speak to people who are dealing with complaints from customers that have moved into a fibre only area and are upset because they cannot get their copper line. People are paying thousands of dollars out of their own pocket to get copper to their building instead of fibre.
This idea would be wonderfully convenient for you, me and a bunch of other people if it existed in isolation from reality.
DonGould:richms: Huge cost on every copper install that doesn't work properly because the copper is beyond end of life and was in most cases only installed with the intention of providing 2 meg primary rate ISDN service on them at fastest.
... rather than being corroded, held together with bits of tape and bodged up 70's era junctions etc.
Aspects of this are just wrong.
In some places the copper is not 1970's. Some copper is very new and in very acceptable condition.
We really shouldn't make blanket statements just to justify our desire to have people make the move to fibre, especially when they're just factually wrong.
In my view, a greater issue is that we've only got limited human resources and we really need all the people focused on fibre not supporting the old technology, that we've already committed to migrating away from, not running around making factually incorrect generalizations.
D
TeaLeaf: i was thinking of the fibre as an extra service not a replacement to the exsiting copper which still can be used for isdn or alarms etc.
richms: As there are less horses drinking from the troffs, then it makes sense to charge them more. $80-90 for a basic analog phoneline to support your 30 year old alarm system starts to make replacing it look more viable. As there are less, make it $110. Suddenly the new eftpos machine that does IP starts to make sense.
There will come a time when they have to stop even allowing dialup connections to the copper network to be made. What sense is there in pushing that out forever just because of a few holdouts - it will become like the analog TV switch off with NZ being one of the last in the world to do it just because there are a small minority that wont upgrade. As for TV there was no way to give them a financial incentive to move over, but with dialup lines, there is.
DonGould: It's time we stopped arguing with them and just got on with our job of getting the country upgraded and off the failing copper.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |