Linux:gabesmith:spacedog:Chorusnz:Hi there, focusing on minimum broadband speed is the wrong way to look at performance over our copper network. Given all the things to consider such as, distance, equipment, quality of cable and network layout, we want to see our lines run at the maximum speed they can.
As mentioned in this thread, FRE's can be a pain. They are time consuming as we often have to work with a number of third parties such as local councils, traffic/road management crews, source specialised equipment/costs, and arrange replacement network or a redesign in some cases.
I can perhaps shed some light on the FRE situation for everyone contributing to this thread and look at the network capability for you. If you’d like, feel free to private message me your address.
^Mike
@chorusnz - sent you a PM. Thank you for offering to help.
My simple view is that under CGA you should not pay for a substandard service. It is the responsibility of the RSP (provider) to manage the resolution of the fault with the supplier (Chorus) in a timely and professional manner. You need to be clear on the difference between an unreliable service vs. the speed of the service. Unreliable is a fault.
Give your RSP a chance to fix the fault and then make it clear you will lodge a case with TDRS https://www.tdr.org.nz/ if you get no resolution to the fault.
@gabesmith The RSP will just disconnect you and then you connect to another RSP and the same thing will happen
John
Hi John when I say you shouldn't have to pay for a substandard service, I don't mean just stop paying, I mean you should be entitled to the service being fixed and refunded for the service not delivered period.