Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.




23 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1


Topic # 205483 15-Nov-2016 13:04
Send private message

Hi there,

 

My apologies if this topic has been discussed somewhere, but my question today is to do specifically with Easements.

 

I live in a Multi Unit Dwelling (townhouses) where we all own part of the land (fee simple, not cross-lease). Our house is only 5 years old, and there was an Easement Instrument to convey telecommunications & computer media.

 

Now, Enable told me that I will need consent from all 10 units on my area - that made me really concerned as I highly doubt all other 9 houses would be so onto it as to give consent and reply Enable.

 

1. Isn't the Easement Instrument itself a 'consent' already?

 

2. The shared driveway is owned by 2 units; I am surprised that Enable needed consent from all 10 townhouses - they said it is because the other 9 maybe inconvenienced by any work done on the shared driveway. Is that correct?

 

Thank you!!


Create new topic
895 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 786

Trusted
Chorus

  Reply # 1671373 15-Nov-2016 14:24
One person supports this post
Send private message

Being just 5 years old, I would have thought this is a unit title situation, where you each own your unit, and a body corporate controls the land on which the units sit. It would be extremely unusual these days for your unit to be fee simple. The twin share ownership of the driveway is also a mystery to me.

 

I would be interested to know the address of the block so that I can do some checks for you (just to satisfy my own curiosity more than anything else).

 

In regards to Enable, existing easements do not allow for fibre services at this point - they generally cover copper based services only, and this is why Enable will require consent. Enable are also not allowed to use existing Chorus duct, so installation of Enable duct could involve a bit of inconvenience to all driveway users. They may be just as confused over the ownership of the land parcel as I am, hence why they believe they require consent from all 10 unit owners. There is also a requirement for them to make fibre service available to all units accessed by the driveway at the time they arrange the first connection, at least to the extent that no further excavation is required on common land should a second or subsequent occupant in the driveway apply for fibre services.

 

If you are not comfortable publishing the street address of the complex, could you please send me a private message with the address? I have several good contacts at Enable to whom I can refer questions if required.





The views expressed by me are not necessarily those of my employer Chorus NZ Ltd


480 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 117

Lifetime subscriber

  Reply # 1671581 15-Nov-2016 21:00
Send private message

There was some discussion of a similar issue in this thread: "Chorus Legal dont understand the LAW regarding easements?"

 

The short answer seems to be that whether or not further consent is legally required, it's part of the process that has to be followed. The thread is in relation to Chorus rather than Enable.


 
 
 
 




23 posts

Geek
+1 received by user: 1


  Reply # 1671631 16-Nov-2016 00:20
Send private message

Thanks guys!

 

Wheelbarrow01 - have PM'ed you.

 

Thanks for the link Froob. I read the forum in detail. Disappointing to hear that although there is a MUC Code, Amy Adams said that it is not currently used by UFB providers?


895 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 786

Trusted
Chorus

  Reply # 1671687 16-Nov-2016 09:01
Send private message

Well I stand corrected! Yes I can see 15 fee simple titles, and the aerial map on the ECan website clearing shows that the driveway used by all actually sits on land belonging to each of the units individually - so essentially as you drive up the driveway, you are driving on each owners section in turn. Very strange setup!

 

Depending on which unit you occupy, you'd have to drive over up to 7 other properties belonging to other people to get to your front door...

 

From my perspective it would appear that every unit has part of the 'shared' driveway on its title, which will be why Enable require consent from every owner. As per my previous thread, Enable have a duty to ensure fibre is available to all units in the development, so when the first application is received, they must complete network design and build to ensure all addresses which use the driveway can have fibre in future.

 

For all their faults, bodies corporate do have their uses - only one consent to be gained, whereas in your case Enable will need to gain 15 individual consents before they can connect you. It only takes one owner to say no and your plans for getting fibre will be scuttled. Good luck!!





The views expressed by me are not necessarily those of my employer Chorus NZ Ltd


Create new topic



Twitter »

Follow us to receive Twitter updates when new discussions are posted in our forums:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when news items and blogs are posted in our frontpage:



Follow us to receive Twitter updates when tech item prices are listed in our price comparison site:



Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.


Support Geekzone »

Our community of supporters help make Geekzone possible. Click the button below to join them.

Support Geezone on PressPatron



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.

Alternatively, you can receive a daily email with Geekzone updates.