Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Paulthagerous

698 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

#58017 4-Mar-2010 14:52
Send private message

Did a speedtest and, aside from speeds being less than 1/20th what they usually are, noticed ping was 0ms:



Now I know this is not the best measure and is quite possibly higher but:  is 0ms technically possible under ideal conditions, or can it never be 0?  Can it even be 0 if we allow for rounding to the nearest ms?

Create new topic
Detruire
1771 posts

Uber Geek


  #304441 4-Mar-2010 15:45
Send private message

0ms would most likely indicate a latency lower than 1ms that has been rounded down.
That would be possible.

An actual latency of 0ms would indicate something akin to teleportation.





rm *




oldmaknz
536 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #304444 4-Mar-2010 15:47

I doubt it's exactly 0 (null), it may be <=0.49ms though. Uni's tend to have epic internet (and that Speedtest server must be extremely close, if not local).

michaeln
238 posts

Master Geek

Trusted

  #304448 4-Mar-2010 15:56
Send private message

No, it's not strinctly possible, but rounded to the nearest ms it's very possible.


Speed of light 299,792,458 m/s
Speed in copper 75% approx
Speed in copper 224,844,344 m/s
Distance (1-way) 10 km
Distance (1-way) 10,000 m
Travel time 0.00 s
Travel time 0.04 ms

Packet size 64 B
Packet size 512 b
Line rate 10 Mbps
Line rate 10000000 bps
Serialisation delay 0.00 s
Serialisation delay 0.05 ms
1-way 0.10 ms
RTT 0.19 ms

I.e., for up to 10km and on a 10Mbps Ethernet, you'd expect  a minimum of 0.19ms round trip for 64byte packets. Actual latency could be higher, for various reasons, but given that processing speed on modern routers is microseconds per packet, you are not going to get above the .5ms needed to round to 1ms.

Note that ADSL imposes several ms of latency due to forward error correction, and cable somewhat less, so you should never see zero ms on current consumer broadband. You on the other hand appear to be fibre connected.
 



vinnieg
2260 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #304459 4-Mar-2010 16:13
Send private message

Paulthagerous: Did a speedtest and, aside from speeds being less than 1/20th what they usually are, noticed ping was 0ms:



Now I know this is not the best measure and is quite possibly higher but:  is 0ms technically possible under ideal conditions, or can it never be 0?  Can it even be 0 if we allow for rounding to the nearest ms?


Nah not possible at the Uni here,

while we do have a 1gb link between campuses and to citylink
The new proxy that was implemented is caching it I think, as well as sharing the load, because when students come back, it gets owned!!!, using the mac Manual staff proxy I get(I'm using a PC):







I have moved across the ditch.  Now residing in Melbourne as a VOIP/Video Technical Trainer/Engineer. 

Paulthagerous

698 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  #304469 4-Mar-2010 16:42
Send private message

michaeln: No, it's not strinctly possible, but rounded to the nearest ms it's very possible.

I.e., for up to 10km and on a 10Mbps Ethernet, you'd expect  a minimum of 0.19ms round trip for 64byte packets. Actual latency could be higher, for various reasons, but given that processing speed on modern routers is microseconds per packet, you are not going to get above the .5ms needed to round to 1ms.

Note that ADSL imposes several ms of latency due to forward error correction, and cable somewhat less, so you should never see zero ms on current consumer broadband. You on the other hand appear to be fibre connected.
 


I assume that of the 1Gb, I have more than enough at any time.  It is my understanding it is connected directly to Citylink with Fibre all the way, and well less than 10km away.  Question now is, in real life with real life interferences etc is it likely to be under the 0.5ms threshold?

vinnieg:
Nah not possible at the Uni here,

while we do have a 1gb link between campuses and to citylink
The new proxy that was implemented is caching it I think, as well as sharing the load, because when students come back, it gets owned!!!, using the mac Manual staff proxy I get(I'm using a PC):





My only query would be this: if the speedtest was cached on a uni server, should my test not have recorded a blazing speed as opposed to the slowest I have ever seen it by at least 10 time? Or am I not getting the point?

Detruire
1771 posts

Uber Geek


  #304472 4-Mar-2010 16:47
Send private message

It's possible that the cache's connection/s to the network is/are being saturated.




rm *


Paulthagerous

698 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  #304473 4-Mar-2010 16:51
Send private message

Will try tomorrow morning at 8 am while all the other students are still asleep lol. Hopefully can replicate ping with blazing speed

 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
vinnieg
2260 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #304475 4-Mar-2010 16:57
Send private message

I think it's something to do with speedtest being a really unreliable measure on a proxy server connection. Not exactly sure what the proxy is doing, but some things are going really weird. Think the speedtest pings have been up and down all day. I think a better test to try is probably the Slingshot NZ online speed test.. although i don't think it'll show the ping, since I think it's blocked on the proxy.

I think it still must be the cache causing hte false 0ms ping test...because everytime I turn it to manual it's got a ping of about 6+ or so, 4-10 is about right for the distance we are from Telstra. Not sure why speedtest.net does it, but running a tracert to Telstraclear brings back a ping of about 8ms for the first hop which sounds about right




I have moved across the ditch.  Now residing in Melbourne as a VOIP/Video Technical Trainer/Engineer. 

rvangelder
352 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #304476 4-Mar-2010 16:59
Send private message

maknz: I doubt it's exactly 0 (null), it may be <=0.49ms though.


a real geek might have said <0.5ms, in case their ping was 0.491ms

Screeb
698 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #304482 4-Mar-2010 17:13
Send private message

is 0ms technically possible under ideal conditions, or can it never be 0?  Can it even be 0 if we allow for rounding to the nearest ms?


Just to spell it out, latency is the time taken for an internet signal to get from one computer to another. This is ALWAYS greater than 0 - after all, no information can move faster than the speed of light. 0ms is either rounding (very nearby server (unlikely) or cache) or a bug.

oldmaknz
536 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #304487 4-Mar-2010 17:21

rvangelder:
maknz: I doubt it's exactly 0 (null), it may be <=0.49ms though.


a real geek might have said <0.5ms, in case their ping was 0.491ms


Could've, should've, would've.

Paulthagerous

698 posts

Ultimate Geek

Trusted

  #304490 4-Mar-2010 17:28
Send private message

Screeb:
is 0ms technically possible under ideal conditions, or can it never be 0?  Can it even be 0 if we allow for rounding to the nearest ms?


Just to spell it out, latency is the time taken for an internet signal to get from one computer to another. This is ALWAYS greater than 0 - after all, no information can move faster than the speed of light. 0ms is either rounding (very nearby server (unlikely) or cache) or a bug.


Figured as much but wanted to check :)

wjw

wjw
162 posts

Master Geek


  #304799 5-Mar-2010 15:12
Send private message

It's got to be a proxy issue. 

 

From a linux box on the above network I get:


PING alias.snap.net.nz (202.37.101.17) 56(84) bytes of data.
64 bytes from alias.snap.net.nz (202.37.101.17): icmp_seq=1 ttl=62 time=0.405 ms
64 bytes from alias.snap.net.nz (202.37.101.17): icmp_seq=2 ttl=62 time=0.351 ms
64 bytes from alias.snap.net.nz (202.37.101.17): icmp_seq=3 ttl=62 time=0.323 ms
64 bytes from alias.snap.net.nz (202.37.101.17): icmp_seq=4 ttl=62 time=0.360 ms
64 bytes from alias.snap.net.nz (202.37.101.17): icmp_seq=5 ttl=62 time=0.445 ms 

Windows ping just shows <1ms 

vinnieg
2260 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #304811 5-Mar-2010 15:23
Send private message

Yeah it is, we started implementing Bluecoat early in Jan(Dec for the trials), seems to be working ok...




I have moved across the ditch.  Now residing in Melbourne as a VOIP/Video Technical Trainer/Engineer. 

Detruire
1771 posts

Uber Geek


#304814 5-Mar-2010 15:30
Send private message

vinnieg: Yeah it is, we started implementing Bluecoat early in Jan(Dec for the trials), seems to be working ok...

Just don't let the license expire.




rm *


Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.