Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


teletek

45 posts

Geek


#60605 28-Apr-2010 20:12
Send private message

Here's something to look forward to in the near future.

Apr. 20, 2010, 9:00pm PDT

In this era of fiber to the home, it's easy to dismiss copper-based DSL, the broadband connectivity technology commonly sold by phone companies worldwide.

Looks like it's too soon to completely write off this technology, however.

Alcatel-Lucent, a company whose lineage is as old as the phone itself, says its research arm, Bell Labs, has been able to achieve downstream speeds of about 300 Mbps (over a distance of 400 meters) or 100 Mbps over a distance of one kilometer.

This is possible using a technology called DSL Phantom Mode. According to the company:

At its core, DSL Phantom Mode involves the creation of a virtual or "phantom" channel that supplements the two physical wires that are the standard configuration for copper transmission lines. Bell Labs innovation and the source of DSL Phantom Mode's dramatic increase in transmission capacity lies in its application of analogue phantom mode technology in combination with industry-standard techniques: vectoring that eliminates interference or "crosstalk" between copper wires, and bonding that makes it possible to take individual lines and aggregate them.

The idea behind DSL Phantom Mode is that incumbent phone companies such as AT&T, which are heavily invested into the aging copper infrastructure, can keep using those pipes for a lot longer. However, phone companies such as Qwest will need to install new gear in the central office and in consumer homes.

Alcatel-Lucent?s efforts aren't the only attempts to extend copper's life and make DSL go faster and faster. Stanford University professor John Cioffi is working on a gigabit DSL solution and has started a company to give DSL a lift.

Source: http://gigaom.com/2010/04/20/dsl-speed-300-mbps/




View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2
mindoka
62 posts

Master Geek


  #324450 28-Apr-2010 22:48
Send private message

near future, year sure.

near future in the technologically advanced world maybe; but not in nz.

:>

i'd be happy to get anything faster tho...

does anyone know what's the average last-mile distance in nz?



NonprayingMantis
6434 posts

Uber Geek


  #324489 29-Apr-2010 00:50
Send private message

mindoka: near future, year sure.

near future in the technologically advanced world maybe; but not in nz.

:>

i'd be happy to get anything faster tho...

does anyone know what's the average last-mile distance in nz?


a mile?    Tongue out

johnr
19282 posts

Uber Geek
Inactive user


  #324490 29-Apr-2010 00:52
Send private message

1.6km



ockel
2031 posts

Uber Geek


  #324501 29-Apr-2010 05:56

This article also appeared on Computerworld and a contributor suggested the average loop length (E side?) is 500m.

At some stage Telecom included a graph showing D side and E side distances in one of their submissions to the Commerce Commission. I cant seem to find which one tho!




Sixth Labour Government - "Vision without Execution is just Hallucination" 


sbiddle
30853 posts

Uber Geek

Retired Mod
Trusted
Biddle Corp
Lifetime subscriber

  #324502 29-Apr-2010 06:32
Send private message

With cabinetisation the maximum distance from an exchange or cabinet is a maximum of roughly 2km.

There are a few other figures regarding distance that I have heard (and can't remember specifics) but I believe that for somewhere around like 75% of those users the distance is under 1km.

ockel
2031 posts

Uber Geek


  #324507 29-Apr-2010 07:05

sbiddle: With cabinetisation the maximum distance from an exchange or cabinet is a maximum of roughly 2km.

There are a few other figures regarding distance that I have heard (and can't remember specifics) but I believe that for somewhere around like 75% of those users the distance is under 1km.


So based on the news article 75% of households could get 100Mbps from this technology?
Thats about the same as GPON fibre?
ANd I'm going to guess that the network and final drop+CPE using this version of bonded VDSL + Phantom mode is likely to cost less than the $3+bn proposed FTTH network?




Sixth Labour Government - "Vision without Execution is just Hallucination" 


CYaBro
4582 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted

  #324556 29-Apr-2010 09:40
Send private message

If the FTTH goes ahead will prices come down for the faster speeds?
We can get fibre here in Whangarei, mostly in the central city but NorthPower are expanding all the time.
All the plans I've seen available for this fibre are 5-10Mbps. This is no faster than an ADSL2+ connection.
Sure your upload speed is the same but who needs that at home?
Prices vary from about $80/mth up to about $300/mth depending on speed and data cap.




Opinions are my own and not the views of my employer.


 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
Ragnor
8219 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #324601 29-Apr-2010 10:59
Send private message

Hard to get excited about this, fibre is better in so many ways:

For example:
- Distance doesn't have as much of a negative effect on performance/line rate
- Lower latency
- Doesn't require two lines
- Has a much higher ceiling for future increases in speed.


ockel
2031 posts

Uber Geek


  #324604 29-Apr-2010 11:03

Ragnor: Hard to get excited about this, fibre is better in so many ways:

For example:
- Distance doesn't have as much of a negative effect on performance/line rate
- Lower latency
- Doesn't require two lines
- Has a much higher ceiling for future increases in speed.



And it garners no incremental revenue but costs billions of dollars for the privilege.

Every company and country should be investing in it.
Those that have already and have regrets please keep quiet.




Sixth Labour Government - "Vision without Execution is just Hallucination" 


Ragnor
8219 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #324623 29-Apr-2010 11:35
Send private message

- No incremental revenue
- Early adopter countries/companies regret their fibre investments

What evidence/research are you basing those two statements on?

ockel
2031 posts

Uber Geek


  #324631 29-Apr-2010 11:50

Ragnor: - No incremental revenue
- Early adopter countries/companies regret their fibre investments

What evidence/research are you basing those two statements on?


Most recently:
Japan scaling back its FTTH target from 50% to 30%.  After 10 years of selling fibre having less than 30% takeup of homes passed (they pass 90% of homes) and average speeds of 7.5Mbps across the country (source Akamai's State of the Internet quarterly report).

Verizon suspending further investment in rolling out fibre - with ~30% takeup of homes passed they have decided to focus on lifting penetration of homes past (ie its uneconomic to keep rolling out).  A $20bn investment to date with 3m connections and still in EBITDA losses (EBITDA less capital expenditure means its a real cashflow drag!).

Axis's quarterly reports indicating the number of connected homes in France and Alberta for the networks they run on behalf of the local operators.  The suspension of RFP for another Canadian region - seems like they might have got cold feet on this fibre thingy.

Prior to that - the Network Strategies report that highlights rollouts in different regions of the world.  None of them making profits and all substantially lower than expectations in terms of take up of services.

There might have been references in the report to the Auckland local authorities on fibre but its been so many months since I read that report that the only timely and relevant data that remains from it:
- 20 years til breakeven with 90% takeup of services and incredibly low funding costs (all debt)
- that Auckland households are willing to pay less for superfast internet + calling + paytv than they currently pay for services now. 
That report is a great read for anyone considering investing in Auckland fibre.




Sixth Labour Government - "Vision without Execution is just Hallucination" 


teletek

45 posts

Geek


#324887 29-Apr-2010 18:45
Send private message

mindoka: near future, year sure.

near future in the technologically advanced world maybe; but not in nz.

:>

i'd be happy to get anything faster tho...

does anyone know what's the average last-mile distance in nz?


Actually it's quite possible it will be available here in the near future as Alcatel Lucent is the supplier of the ISAMs that are being installed by Chorus as part of the FTTN project.

Each ISAM Linecard is already capable of xDSL services up to VDSL2 which can deliver 100Mbps down but have been soft limited in NZ to 50Mbps for realiability.

So it's quite conceivable that we could see ISAM Linecard coming out with the new 300Mbps options well before the final ISAMs are installed in late 2011.


teletek

45 posts

Geek


  #324893 29-Apr-2010 18:56
Send private message

Ragnor: Hard to get excited about this, fibre is better in so many ways:

For example:
- Distance doesn't have as much of a negative effect on performance/line rate
- Lower latency
- Doesn't require two lines
- Has a much higher ceiling for future increases in speed.



Sure Fibre has these advantages and that is why Fibre is the backbone of the existing Telecommunications here in NZ and around the world.

The only drawback for last mile applications is that it requires overlaying the copper network at the last mile for each subscriber. An extremely costly exercise which no privately owned company in NZ has been prepared to back to date. ROI does not stack up to get financed. It's simply not commercially viable.

Fibre will come in time as a natural expansion of the networks.

The point that many are missing is that there still a lot of life left in the copper infrastructure that allows for high speed data transmission when the need arises for an individual subscriber, all without putting a shovel in the ground.

What's so bad about that?




ockel
2031 posts

Uber Geek


  #325057 30-Apr-2010 05:39

teletek:
Ragnor: Hard to get excited about this, fibre is better in so many ways:

For example:
- Distance doesn't have as much of a negative effect on performance/line rate
- Lower latency
- Doesn't require two lines
- Has a much higher ceiling for future increases in speed.



Sure Fibre has these advantages and that is why Fibre is the backbone of the existing Telecommunications here in NZ and around the world.

The only drawback for last mile applications is that it requires overlaying the copper network at the last mile for each subscriber. An extremely costly exercise which no privately owned company in NZ has been prepared to back to date. ROI does not stack up to get financed. It's simply not commercially viable.

Fibre will come in time as a natural expansion of the networks.

The point that many are missing is that there still a lot of life left in the copper infrastructure that allows for high speed data transmission when the need arises for an individual subscriber, all without putting a shovel in the ground.

What's so bad about that?





Its a shame that the Prime Minister (thanks to the NZ Institute) and the Government miss the point too. 
Spending $1.5bn on reducing the countries debt or having more doctors/teachers/etc rather than a meaningless replacement of something that isnt broken.




Sixth Labour Government - "Vision without Execution is just Hallucination" 


Zeon
3916 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #325359 30-Apr-2010 16:45
Send private message

I would tend to agree. I wouldn't mind however seeing commercial/industrial areas supplied with more affordable fibre options. E.g. atm it's kinda like $2000 per month for 10mbps/1mbps international on a 36month contract. 100mbps National for $300-$400 a month would create a lot more update and could create a thriving SaaS industry in NZ.

In terms of peoples home, there isn't much point apart from new subdivisions or where the road is already being ripped up. TBH most of the speed problems are due to Telecom Wholesales poor backhaul network and pricing model. I think the biggest gain a Telecom independent fibre rollout will see is the ability to bypass that problem.

Maybe the 1.5BN could be used by companies like FX to build their own networks to the cabinets and provide a true high bandwidth competing option against Telecom wholesale.




Speedtest 2019-10-14


 1 | 2
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.