![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
I've been doing a scan for networks every couple of weeks. Last time I did it, NZ Communications weren't showing up, now they are. I'm in Linwood in Christchurch.
Jonathan
steveonz: I found a funny submission from Econet to ComCom
Vodafone colocation
The French telecoms regulator, Arcep has announced plans to start regulating mobile termination rates, and require a gradual reduction in the rates charged to landline operators over the next few years.
In this Decision, Arcep set the ceiling tariffs that operators could charge for mobile voice call termination up to 30 June 2009. The Authority has today launched a public consultation on its draft decision concerning the rate control plan to which the three mobile operators will be subject during the period running from 1 July 2009 to 31 December 2010.
Because mobile voice call termination rates and the constraints involved in altering retail offers have a fundamental effect on the sector, a transitional period is needed to give the market time to adapt. The operators have underscored the fact that too radical adjustment of wholesale prices could undermine market stability by creating opportunities for circumvention, for instance, or by upsetting the balance of certain offers.
As a result, the Authority believes that, although incremental costs can constitute a more suitable relevant cost concept, this cost level needs to be attained over a transitional period of several years.
Under these circumstances, the Authority proposes to pursue its policy of a progressive and pragmatic decrease in call termination rates by imposing a decrease, as of 1 July 2009, in the mobile call termination rate from 6.5 to 4.5 eurocents/minute for Orange France and SFR, and from 8.5 to 6 eurocents/minute for Bouygues Telecom, and a second decrease as of 1 July 2010 from 4.5 to 3 eurocents/minute for Orange France and SFR, and from 6 to 4 eurocents/minute for Bouygues Telecom.
These rates are to be compared to the corresponding cost estimates of an efficient operator which, for 2008, range from 1 to 2.9 eurocents, depending on the calculation method employed.
Posted to the site on 26th October 2008
Posted to: www.cellular-news.com/story/34309.php
NZ Comms should just give up now; they are already beyond a joke, but launching with a 2G GSM network?
Forget it.
nzbnw
nzbnw:NZ Comms should just give up now; they are already beyond a joke, but launching with a 2G GSM network?
Forget it.
nzbnw <p
steveonz: Considering there is alot of people still on GSM?.... thats a pretty silly comment.
I can see contruction of a new tower from my office and there is another one they are weorking right now above my house. I dont think they will give up....
Yes I understand that, but GSM is old hat. Let’s just say they do get off the ground here, and launch nationwide with 2G EDGE (native coverage) and 2G GPRS roaming, they will likely limit their appeal to customers who are likely to have low ARPU. At some stage they are going to have to introduce 3G, either via a roaming / wholesale agreement or by themselves if they wish to attract customers who use 3G data services, such as video, mobile data cards etc.
Why not just install 3G technology now instead of wasting more money? 3G can be used to satisfy those who wish to only call and text, and make use of other 3G services.
nzbnw
steveonz: The only reason we al care so much... I because we all know we are paying way too much. After researching this topic for the past 7 years I know the arguments pf the high price we pay… but it’s inexcusable for charging us all so much!
Heck a friend of mine called from his Cell in USA to NZ, he only paid US $0.03 per minute.
An I can call from my 2talk SIP account a US Mobile for NZ0.05 cent / minute.. though I have a feeling that the US mobile also pays 5c perminute as well..
Regards,
Old3eyes
steveonz: A friend of mine at chorus said it was 3G he hocked up… And it was defiantly NZ Comms, aparntly they are in a big rush.. Saying something about “Rain is not an excuse”
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |