Will be interesting to see how it turns out, if this is anything to go by...
Quite disappointing as users are paying for for their bandwidth through datablocks.
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
cokemaster: Though, if they had a 'go large' type plan while keeping their traditional 'pay for data' plans - no objections.By what Telecom's been through, I wouldn't. (Yes, I was on Go Large for 3 months - that was the catalyst for switching my ISP)
hellonearthisman: I think it's a bit soon to say if it's going to be bad, I really don't think that CallPlus will do a blanket ban on torrents, just drop the speeds by 90% to balance the supposed illegal content.
They have been doing traffic shaping for sometime and all networks will get more shaping as time goes on.
The QoS is a for of shaping, in that it slows your data to get priority data through.
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
cokemaster:hellonearthisman: I think it's a bit soon to say if it's going to be bad, I really don't think that CallPlus will do a blanket ban on torrents, just drop the speeds by 90% to balance the supposed illegal content.
And how will they identify 'illegal content'? Will they be responisble for identifying all the child porn, movies, games, music, terrorist plans, hate speech which are on torrents???
cokemaster:
The performance exhbitied by this slingshot connection at home is pityful with torrents as it stands. Dial up could literally be faster at times (yes, this is with port fowarding and everything set up). Though, when one gets 10mbps through Xtra which goes through the same exchange, you know that there are problems.
They say, they 90% is illegal, so if they drop the speed by 90% they are are fighting this problem. *creative use of maths
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
Throttling P2P traffic on a "flat rate" or "unlimited" plan has become the norm overseas. It's also the basis of some nasty legal lawsuits being threatened in the USA at present against a certain ISP who decided they were going to do this.
So what's the problem? I pay for an internet connection and here in NZ most of us pay for a plan with a cap. Why should any ISP be telling me how I can use my data cap? I don't see any issue with doing this for plans such as Go Large but introducing traffic shaping on regular plans is taking things way too far IMHO.
One does have to wonder the point of throtling P2P on a limited data plan. If a customer buys 15Gb, it makes absolutly no difference how they use that 15Gb.
Smacks of bowing to the MAFIAA
Loose lips may sink ships - Be smart - Don't post internal/commercially sensitive or confidential information!
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |