Vmware ESX 5

Forums › IT Pro and developers › Vmware ESX 5

lxsw20

2184 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 661

Subscriber

Topic # 87017 18-Jul-2011 10:23

Interested in who has seen the new VRam based pricing structure. What are your thoughts on it? Are you considering using another visualization product now?

Seems it would mean we need 3x enterprise plus licenses per server for 128GB of ram which is a massive cost.....

1 | 2

Professional yak shaver
1599 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8

Trusted

BitSignal

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 494513 18-Jul-2011 10:31

Leave it to VMware to make an expensive product even MORE expensive. ;)

"Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads." - Doc Emmet Brown

Zeon

3409 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 404

Trusted

Reply # 494542 18-Jul-2011 10:54

Yea I saw this. We have been using ESXi for a while now and around 2 months away from shifting to their paid for products. Really glad we hadn't already taken the plunge as this changes the whole economics of it. Will probably look at Xen Server or Hyper V now.

magu

Professional yak shaver
1599 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8

Trusted

BitSignal

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 494546 18-Jul-2011 10:56

Zeon: Yea I saw this. We have been using ESXi for a while now and around 2 months away from shifting to their paid for products. Really glad we hadn't already taken the plunge as this changes the whole economics of it. Will probably look at Xen Server or Hyper V now.

We were running ESXi, tested XenServer for a while and now went back to ESXi. All in their free offerings. Although XenServer gives you more for the free version, we found it less reliable.

But VMware really screwed up their SME pricing now.

"Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads." - Doc Emmet Brown

lxsw20

2184 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 661

Subscriber

Reply # 494551 18-Jul-2011 10:58

Interested in what you mean by less reliable?

billgates

3830 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 234

Trusted

Reply # 494561 18-Jul-2011 11:06

What's worse is that the free ESXi now only supports 8GB vRAM. They want students and folks to set up their labs on Hyper-V or Xenserver. VMware have shot themselves on the foot.

Do whatever you want to do man.

magu

Professional yak shaver
1599 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8

Trusted

BitSignal

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 494572 18-Jul-2011 11:13

lxsw20: Interested in what you mean by less reliable?

We had some bad experiences with VMs not booting up properly after a host reboot, and the OS we're using (Ubuntu) wasn't officially supported by Citrix until recently (still in beta, apparently).

VMware, even though costly, is much more robust in that sense.

"Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads." - Doc Emmet Brown

magu

Professional yak shaver
1599 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8

Trusted

BitSignal

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 494574 18-Jul-2011 11:14

billgates: What's worse is that the free ESXi now only supports 8GB vRAM. They want students and folks to set up their labs on Hyper-V or Xenserver. VMware have shot themselves on the foot.

That I didn't know! Big problem for us.

"Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads." - Doc Emmet Brown

billgates

3830 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 234

Trusted

Reply # 494610 18-Jul-2011 11:57

magu:
billgates: What's worse is that the free ESXi now only supports 8GB vRAM. They want students and folks to set up their labs on Hyper-V or Xenserver. VMware have shot themselves on the foot.

That I didn't know! Big problem for us.

How much vRAM does a VMware vSphere Hypervisor license provide?
A vSphere Hypervisor license includes a vRAM entitlement of 8GB.

They have renamed free ESXi to VMware vSphere Hypervisor. I think VMware is just milking it now because they know that Hyper-V, Xenserver and KVM are catching up. They might as well make as much $$$ as they can before their marketshare will drop.

edit - Just so everyone knows, if you have the essentials kit licensing on version 5 then the vRAM policy is enforced by the vSphere 5 server. On the standard and above licensing, it's not enforced so if you do go overboard, your server will stay unlincensed but it will let you install VM's.

4.1 still has 8 years I think before EOL so good enough for us for now.

Do whatever you want to do man.

magu

Professional yak shaver
1599 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8

Trusted

BitSignal

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 494613 18-Jul-2011 12:00

This is their old pricing: http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere/pricing.html

The new one is available as a very complicated PDF: http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vsphere_pricing.pdf

"Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads." - Doc Emmet Brown

sidkumar

84 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 1

Reply # 494710 18-Jul-2011 13:50

magu: This is their old pricing: http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere/pricing.html

The new one is available as a very complicated PDF: http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vsphere_pricing.pdf

Thanks for sharing the document magu, it does clarify a few things. Looks like there will be a few unhappy customers of VMware. Another viewpoint is also blogged at http://www.nzcs.org.nz/newsletter/article/152
In principle I support vRAM based licensing but I do agree that the vRAM limit should be increased from 48GB to somewhat more reasonable. It is unfair on existing customers to pay more if they want to move to vSphere 5.

magu

Professional yak shaver
1599 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 8

Trusted

BitSignal

Lifetime subscriber

Reply # 494731 18-Jul-2011 14:07

sidkumar:
magu: This is their old pricing: http://www.vmware.com/products/vsphere/pricing.html

The new one is available as a very complicated PDF: http://www.vmware.com/files/pdf/vsphere_pricing.pdf

Thanks for sharing the document magu, it does clarify a few things. Looks like there will be a few unhappy customers of VMware. Another viewpoint is also blogged at http://www.nzcs.org.nz/newsletter/article/152
In principle I support vRAM based licensing but I do agree that the vRAM limit should be increased from 48GB to somewhat more reasonable. It is unfair on existing customers to pay more if they want to move to vSphere 5.

My big beef with VMware (and it's always been the same) is how expensive is to go from the Essentials kit (3-host limit) to 4 hosts. It's unreasonable.

"Roads? Where we're going, we don't need roads." - Doc Emmet Brown

gjm

747 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 91

Reply # 494780 18-Jul-2011 15:10

we currently have a small number of 4.1 hosts running standard edition, each with 64 gigs of RAM. Under this model it seems the best way for us to proceed is to purchase 2 enterprise edition licenses for each host (no upgrade rights from standard to enterprise even though we have paid for support) which will increase the costs about 300%

Honestly...wtf is this?

[Amstrad CPC 6128: 128k Memory: 3 inch floppy drive: Colour Screen]

browned

627 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 32

Reply # 494859 18-Jul-2011 16:24

Isn't vRam the ram assigned to the virtual machine, not the host server?

Home Server: AMD Ryzen 2700, 64GB, 56TB HDD, HP Smart Array P420, Define R5 Case, 10GbE, ESXi 6.7, NextPVR, Emby Server, Plex Server, 2 x HDHomerun.
Lounge Media Center: NVIDIA Shield TV 16GB: Kodi18.a2/SPMC17a11 with Titan, Emby, NextPVR, 250GB SSD.
Kids Media Center: NVIDIA Shield TV 16GB: Kodi18.a2/SPMC17.a11 with Titan, Emby, NextPVR, 120GB SSD
Test Center: NVIDIA Shield TV Pro 500GB. Plex Media Server, Kodi18.a2/SPMC17a11 with Titan, Emby, HDHomerun.
Main PC: Ryzen 7, M.2, 24GB RAM, Nvidia GT730 + RX 570, 512GB ADATA SSD, 2 x 2TB HDD, 2 x 24" Panasonic LCD TV, Blu-ray drive, Windows 10, Kodi18.a2, Emby, Titan.

gjm

747 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 91

Reply # 494866 18-Jul-2011 16:32

yup and currently that would be fine. Its when we upgrade everything to 2008 svr that we are going to have a problem.

[Amstrad CPC 6128: 128k Memory: 3 inch floppy drive: Colour Screen]

billgates

3830 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 234

Trusted

Reply # 494872 18-Jul-2011 16:47

browned: Isn't vRam the ram assigned to the virtual machine, not the host server?

The licensing with vSphere 5 say for e.g entitles you to 24GB vRAM under Standard kit. That's for all the VM's combined that will be powered on on a host server. 24GB is the total limit for all VM's combined that are powered on. It's pathetic really. Not against vRAM pricing but they need to increase the vRAM allocation/license by quite a bit.

Do whatever you want to do man.

1 | 2