networkn:
Yea i mean no offence ;)
Yes of course as pointed out the point of diminished returns is true, but as my previous point it all depends.
Id say 6gb comes close to that limit, but as you say it may not be huge, more minor.
Sorry, my response was a little prickly when I re-read it. I apologise.
They will no doubt test the living snot out of this thing to see if it makes a difference, but I'll bet $10 paid to a charity of your choosing, that the results are so minimal as to not be relevant or have a detrimental effect in some other way.
Actually i looked at mine and thought the same, can be easy sometimes to feel arrogant. I was when i was younger.
But yea your bet would have good odds.
IMO it would only show a impact when more apps are used simultanously.
Heres a example where memory would have an effect.
https://youtu.be/233f0ewFWGk
Now the memory is the same in both variants but the memory management is more poor in the snapdragon variant and almost simulates a phone with less memory.
The first lap displays how a faster processor reduces app loading times like here in the exynos variant. The second lap displays the ram managements effects where keeping a app in background can allow a faster return to a app.
A phone with less memory is forced to commit to these conditions (like this snapdragon) and a phone with more memory acts more like the exynos.
Now 4gb appears to be just enough to run a good deal of apps, so 6gb could be so minimal, nearly unnoticeable. But it would allow that headroom to reduce the mathematic possibility.
ID Verified
Trusted
