networkn:
One thing you, and everyone else fails to understand when making these arguments that benefit abuse isn't a big problem, is the loss of productivity that each of these people cause. Those people don't pay anywhere near the amount of tax, nor do they contribute to the workforce the way
working people (on the whole) do, which adds to the countries GDP Etc.
Also there are the flow on effects, that a number of people on benefits are living unhealthy lifestyles (Not saying all, before you jump down my throat, and yes I do understand it's often a matter of low income), often don't get medical issues resolved in a timely fashion and all that puts a strain on limited health resources.
I'm not disagreeing with you, but I am trying to put some perspective on it.
Of the total beneficiaries, the percentage who stay on benefits for long periods of time are low, therefore while there any flow on effects, the actual number of people in that category are low.
I support measures to reduce long term welfare dependants, but they have to be carefully balanced with not harming the vulnerable. If people who are genuinely in need are cut off they will end up on the streets and/or committing crime - and that isn't you for anyone.
At a macro level, if you really want to improve the economy - targeting the very small number of long term beneficiaries will cost a lot of money and net little return to the economy. What we need to do is target corporate tax avoidance, and properly tax wealth.