JPNZ:
tdgeek:
Jas777: Yes.
The other thing will be how they price it. Up the monthly sub or as a separate package. And if a separate package how cater for a test or odi that has lots of rain.
Plus sometimes nz cricket has a year of Bangladesh and Sri Lanka which might not get a great uptake.
How Spark prices it? Do you think they will increase the sub from $20, or make it seperate like RWC? Did they do that when they added the other sports? Its a package. Sky doesnt do that either
It will be interesting if they paid a lot for this I am betting that it won't be $20 a month anymore.
On the domestic thing mentioned above by Varkk, rubbish about numbers dwindling because sky got it, numbers have dwindled because NZ domestic cricket doesn't have black caps (or overseas professionals) playing in it. Nobody wants to go down and watch amatuer players play in a crappy domestic competition.
Nine australia when it had the rights used to stop FTA coverage in the city where ODI's were played in to force people to go to the game. If you wanted to watch it in Sydney or Melbourne you had to go buy a ticket, when it sold out they put it on free to air. The BBL is a perfect example of bringing back the crowds, Big players, overseas professionals, fantastic added entertainment and average crowds are 20 to 30k. in NZ last year you'd be lucky to get 3k
Spark has about 20% the viewership Sky has and you think thats going to grow cricket in NZ?
My point was will the $20 increase. Local cricket would be cheap. It doesnt seem popular. Black Caps will be popular but Spark doesn't have offshore series.
Sky has rugby, attendances are low. Admission is cheap, but attendances are low. Whether that's due to a paywall or not, no idea.
If cricket was on Spark and not Sky people would buy the Spark sub, so you would expect most cricket viewers to continue to view, no matter who was broadcasting it. Unless $20 per month is too costly. What will grow cricket is $, and whoever pays those $, which is now Sky and Spark