Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ... | 8
Batman
Mad Scientist
29766 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1355673 31-Jul-2015 08:29
Send private message

Thing is, finding the stuff at the notion of the ocean and what they look like, how they're spread, will give lots more information than we have now. They may not be able to prove anything but the answer will be pretty clear



Batman
Mad Scientist
29766 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1355674 31-Jul-2015 08:30
Send private message

And I think the fdr records six hours or something. Will tell who/what was in control

Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek


  #1355699 31-Jul-2015 09:01
Send private message

Jaxson:
alasta: The question is whether they will ever find the black boxes and, in the unlikely event that they do, will they provide any useful information


Yeah info I read way back at the start suggested some of these, especially the cabin voice recorder etc, are on a 2 hour cycle only, so there is a good chance they'll have a lot of silence only...


The location of this wreckage isn't likely to be very useful in locating the black boxes - except perhaps to motivate continued search.  It's not going to narrow down the search area, just eliminate possibility it went down elsewhere, far south or north of the original search area.  The size of that part might be indication that the plane was ditched and under pilot control - if it was under autopilot and at cruise until it ran out of fuel, then it would have probably hit the water so hard that pieces that size would have been shredded.  Possible that the flaperon was extended at the time so torn off during a controlled ditching at sea.  They can deduce many things about the final impact just from looking at that one part.
Even if they can't locate the black boxes and/or they don't contain the answers, there might be cellphones etc on the bottom of the sea with recoverable data recorded on them.



networkn
Networkn
32353 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1355744 31-Jul-2015 09:56
Send private message

They are sending the parts to France to investigate and see if they are indeed the parts from MH370, but holy crapsticks, SURELY confirmation is as simple as this: 

Investigator to person who found aircraft bits: 

"Please read out the numbers on the part you found"

"sure, they are xxxx.xxxx-xxx"

Investigator types numbers into registered part list: 

"I can confirm this part belongs to MH370" or "I can confirm this is not MH370 but rather xxx"

Doesn't solve the mystery, doesn't 100% prove it, but makes then able to give a 95% likely confirmation.

Dulouz
883 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1355749 31-Jul-2015 10:04
Send private message

The purported debris may have been planted by the individuals who took MH370 to make it seem like it crashed into the Indian ocean.




Amanon

networkn
Networkn
32353 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1355763 31-Jul-2015 10:11
Send private message

Dulouz: The purported debris may have been planted by the individuals who took MH370 to make it seem like it crashed into the Indian ocean.


Yes, anything is possible I guess. Still...

Batman
Mad Scientist
29766 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1355843 31-Jul-2015 11:17
Send private message

Dulouz: The purported debris may have been planted by the individuals who took MH370 to make it seem like it crashed into the Indian ocean.


I'm sure it is very easy to tell if the bit's been floating in the ocean for 18 months or 1 week, and whether it was removed by a welder, a hydraulic machine, a bomb, or ripped by natural forces.

 
 
 

Trade NZ and US shares and funds with Sharesies (affiliate link).
Batman
Mad Scientist
29766 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1355847 31-Jul-2015 11:19
Send private message

and if it was taken into the ocean, I expect more bits to be found over time, showing the same things. but finding out what actually happen will be by chance, a lot of luck, or praying to the ocean to give it up.

Batman
Mad Scientist
29766 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1355858 31-Jul-2015 11:24
Send private message

Dulouz: The purported debris may have been planted by the individuals who took MH370 to make it seem like it crashed into the Indian ocean.


looks like someone's on to it http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=11489770

Batman
Mad Scientist
29766 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1355907 31-Jul-2015 11:52
Send private message

networkn: They are sending the parts to France to investigate and see if they are indeed the parts from MH370, but holy crapsticks, SURELY confirmation is as simple as this: 

Investigator to person who found aircraft bits: 

"Please read out the numbers on the part you found"

"sure, they are xxxx.xxxx-xxx"

Investigator types numbers into registered part list: 

"I can confirm this part belongs to MH370" or "I can confirm this is not MH370 but rather xxx"

Doesn't solve the mystery, doesn't 100% prove it, but makes then able to give a 95% likely confirmation.


apparently someone's done that now http://edition.cnn.com/2015/07/30/world/mh370-debris-investigation/index.html

tdgeek
29749 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1356966 2-Aug-2015 09:09
Send private message

How does Stuff get away with this

The headline is not what the article said.

 

MH370: Debris 'definitely' from lost flight, says Malaysia Airlines

networkn
Networkn
32353 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1356976 2-Aug-2015 09:35
Send private message

tdgeek: How does Stuff get away with this

The headline is not what the article said.
MH370: Debris 'definitely' from lost flight, says Malaysia Airlines


Stuff is essentially a tabloid now, but they purport themselves as a reputable source of news. I wish there was a place to report such crap reporting.

Technofreak
6530 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1356992 2-Aug-2015 09:53
Send private message

joker97: there is only one possible cause - pilot, co-pilot.
the more likely was the pilot who did it. very very intricately plotted.


I'm not sure how you can be so sure.  I'm pleased people with preconceived ideas like this are not employed as accident investigators.

Until they find and analyse the FDR and CVR we will never know.  Even with the the FDR and CVR there may be be no certainty.

Unlike the German Wings crash there has been no concrete evidence that either flight crew member had a reason to to this. I'm not saying they didn't do it, but there's been no other solid evidence to indicate they might have. In most "suicide" crashes there has been strong corroborating evidence from somewhere in the pilots background.




Sony Xperia XA2 running Sailfish OS. https://sailfishos.org The true independent open source mobile OS 
Samsung Galaxy Tab S6
Dell Inspiron 14z i5


Batman
Mad Scientist
29766 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1357018 2-Aug-2015 11:00
Send private message

Yes that's true. But we have facts and we can make some deductions

Fact
1. Plane had everything disabled, changed course, flew across the Malaysian peninsular in a specific course. These all happened right after goodnight Malaysian 370.

Deduction
1. Someone turned off everything
2. Someone was in control of the plane
3. No one attempted any distress call.

Who could cause all 3 to happen?

Batman
Mad Scientist
29766 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1357022 2-Aug-2015 11:07
Send private message

Assuming fact 2 is proven in the week, that is a 777 is in the Indian ocean, and only one ever 777 is not accounted for.

Deduction
1. MH370 did end up in the Indian ocean, not Pakistan, Kazakhstan, or someone's backyard.
2. Someone did all 3 of the above, and took them into the Indian ocean.

Who could have done that?

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ... | 8
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.