![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
juha:mjsit&t: They must still be operating a 850mhz GSM network in the cities as well as 2100MHZ, if they want the roaming dollar they will.
Newps... that's not the plan currently. UMTS 2100 in cities, GSM 850 outside.
mjsit&t:sbiddle:juha:mjsit&t: They must still be operating a 850mhz GSM network in the cities as well as 2100MHZ, if they want the roaming dollar they will.
Newps... that's not the plan currently. UMTS 2100 in cities, GSM 850 outside.
That just wouldn't make sence. It would have to be 850MHz nationwide with WCDMA 2100 in the major cities.
juha: And, Vodafone will have 900MHz HSDPA in towns...
TinyTim:juha: And, Vodafone will have 900MHz HSDPA in towns...
They'll have to off-load a lot of voice traffic onto 2.1GHz UMTS before they can do that, especially once they lose some of their 900MHz spectrum.
sbiddle:TinyTim:juha: And, Vodafone will have 900MHz HSDPA in towns...
They'll have to off-load a lot of voice traffic onto 2.1GHz UMTS before they can do that, especially once they lose some of their 900MHz spectrum.
It really depends how much 900MHz spectrum they really need. Vodafone claim they currently use the entire 2x22.5mhz they have MR's for. If they do it's probably in part due to building a network with very low frequency reuse. Many European operators copewith 2x7.5Mhz of 900MHz spectrum and far greater user bases. Vodafone have plenty of 1800MHz GSM spectrum and only make quite limited use of this, it would be very easy to keep the existing GSM capacity by rolling out additional GSM 1800 sites.
sbiddle:
Nobody really knows at this stage what's going to happen with existing 800 and 900 MR's but you would have to argue that existing owners of MR's would be unfairly disadvantaged if they were forced to give up any of their existing spectrum. MR's are only a right to use a piece of spectrum and not ownership of that spectrum but trying to force a company to give up spectrum verges on being rather anti competitive.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |