Geekzone: technology news, blogs, forums
Guest
Welcome Guest.
You haven't logged in yet. If you don't have an account you can register now.


Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek


#199031 1-Aug-2016 16:58
Send private message

This study is very bad news: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep29901

 

Of course the sample size was very small, but they've been able to replicate vascular degeneration in mice by exposing them to radiation.

 

With the Apollo mission, time spent outside of the earth's magnetosphere was typically 8 days or so, a trip to mars might take 8 months, plus the same to get back.  There's no magnetosphere on Mars, and no protection on the surface from the very sparse atmosphere. Shielding a spacecraft is a problem, then the problem of shielding once you got there.  You'd actually have to be quite deep underground to be safe from spallation / showers.  


View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic
 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Linuxluver
5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1602385 1-Aug-2016 17:09
Send private message

So it looks like creating a magnetosphere of some kind - at least locally - is an important thing to do. 





_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 




Rikkitic
Awrrr
18657 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1602407 1-Aug-2016 18:07
Send private message

I haven't immersed myself in any of this but I do recall reading something about experimental science to reduce human susceptibility to such radiation, possibly through gene therapy or drugs or other techniques. Something like this might set human exploration back a few years but I would be willing to bet that ways around it can be found.

 

 





Plesse igmore amd axxept applogies in adbance fir anu typos

 


 


JWR

JWR
821 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1602408 1-Aug-2016 18:08

Linuxluver:

 

So it looks like creating a magnetosphere of some kind - at least locally - is an important thing to do. 

 

 

 

 

Water is relatively good for absorbing the radiation.

 

They have to take a lot of water for human space travel.

 

The walls could be lined with it.




DarthKermit
5346 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted

  #1602410 1-Aug-2016 18:15
Send private message

Does this mean that there can't actually be any little green men from Mars?


gzt

gzt
17104 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1602414 1-Aug-2016 18:23
Send private message

They live in the tunnels

JWR

JWR
821 posts

Ultimate Geek


  #1602427 1-Aug-2016 18:35

DarthKermit:

 

Does this mean that there can't actually be any little green men from Mars?

 

 

Probably have to be something more like this... 

 


gzt

gzt
17104 posts

Uber Geek

Lifetime subscriber

  #1602455 1-Aug-2016 19:35
Send private message

Fred99:

This study is very bad news: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep29901



In practice it will not be an issue. NASA has already initiated examination of the issue. For example:


The winners of the radiation challenge's first round are:

1st place ($5,000): George Hitt, assistant professor of physics and nuclear engineering at Khalifa University, United Arab Emirates, for proposing a reusable shield that could be placed in an orbit between Earth and Mars.

2nd Place ($3,000): Ian Gallon, retired researcher in electromagnetics of Bridport, England. He provided mathematical calculations for an active radiation mitigation system.

3rd Place ($2,000): Olivier Loido, freelance engineer of Toulouse, France. He proposed a launch configuration and a magnet array deployment.

4th Place ($1,000 each): Markus Novak, recent graduate from Ohio State University of Dublin, Ohio, who found safe areas for travel after performing particle trajectory simulations. Also, Mikhail Petrichenkov of Russia, who described how operations could work using a NASA storm shelter

 
 
 

Cloud spending continues to surge globally, but most organisations haven’t made the changes necessary to maximise the value and cost-efficiency benefits of their cloud investments. Download the whitepaper From Overspend to Advantage now.
Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek


  #1602625 2-Aug-2016 00:17
Send private message

It is a huge issue - it's ridiculous to say it won't be.  There are people suggesting that manned mission to Mars could happen in the 2030s, yet there are only wild untested ideas to mitigate the radiation hazard - and as that paper suggests, poor understanding of the hazard.

 

I'm a bit sceptical of those "radiation challenge" ideas.  The title of the challenge was actually "Reducing Galactic Cosmic Rays to Enable Long Duration Deep Space Human Exploration", I assume the winner's "shield" may protect a spacecraft from SEP (from the sun) but not GCR unless the shield completely enveloped the spacecraft - which would be a hell of an engineering challenge.  It may have been a good answer - but perhaps not to the question.

 

NASA have new GCR simulation, the mouse study exposed mice to HZE including Fe +26 , but not at (anywhere near) the energies of GCR, not at the sustained (but lower) dose, no idea of what dose and spectrum for the astronauts would be - because they don't know what shielding can be practically used.  Oh - and the test subjects were mice.

 

Then this study is suggesting that radiation induced CVD may be much more of a hazard than assumed (it was known about, but assumed to be less of a risk than radiation induced cancer).  If that's correct, then it's back to the drawing board.

 

 


Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek


  #1602626 2-Aug-2016 00:23
Send private message

JWR: 

 

Probably have to be something more like this...

 

 

 

That's a cosmonaut - not an astronaut or an alien.  If we find them on Mars, then Russia got there first.


Batman
Mad Scientist
29760 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1602642 2-Aug-2016 07:10
Send private message

So what happens with the people who have signed up/picked/offered to go to Mars in ?2018


tdgeek
29740 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Lifetime subscriber

  #1602643 2-Aug-2016 07:21
Send private message

Exploration is good. Past base exploration, I guess its seeking other places to live, gather resources, etc. I reckon there might be another planet in the solar system worth checking out. Maybe one that needs a bit of repair first. Can't think where.....


MikeB4
18435 posts

Uber Geek

ID Verified
Trusted

  #1602644 2-Aug-2016 07:24
Send private message

I am sure Trump will tell us he has a fix for this

Linuxluver
5828 posts

Uber Geek

Trusted
Subscriber

  #1602651 2-Aug-2016 07:54
Send private message

JWR:

 

Linuxluver:

 

So it looks like creating a magnetosphere of some kind - at least locally - is an important thing to do. 

 

 

 

 

Water is relatively good for absorbing the radiation.

 

They have to take a lot of water for human space travel.

 

The walls could be lined with it.

 

 

Regular H2O? Or Deuterium? (D2O) They use the latter in nuclear reactors to cool the core and minimise radiation leakage. 

 

(Just asking for clarity on the point). 





_____________________________________________________________________

I've been on Geekzone over 16 years..... Time flies.... 


andrew027
1286 posts

Uber Geek


  #1602666 2-Aug-2016 08:15
Send private message

MikeB4: I am sure Trump will tell us he has a fix for this

 

Make Mars great again?


Fred99

13684 posts

Uber Geek


  #1602677 2-Aug-2016 08:35
Send private message

Linuxluver:

 

JWR:

 

Linuxluver:

 

So it looks like creating a magnetosphere of some kind - at least locally - is an important thing to do. 

 

 

 

 

Water is relatively good for absorbing the radiation.

 

They have to take a lot of water for human space travel.

 

The walls could be lined with it.

 

 

Regular H2O? Or Deuterium? (D2O) They use the latter in nuclear reactors to cool the core and minimise radiation leakage. 

 

(Just asking for clarity on the point). 

 

 

 

 

I'm guessing that regular H20 would be safer and more efficient, D20 not used for shielding as such but as a neutron moderator in reactors.

 

An advantage of water for shielding is that it's needed anyway to sustain life, but they'd need to recycle it to keep the tanks full.  Hydrogen (fuel) could be used for the same purpose, but with the problem that once it's used you haven't got a shield.


 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
View this topic in a long page with up to 500 replies per page Create new topic





News and reviews »

Air New Zealand Starts AI adoption with OpenAI
Posted 24-Jul-2025 16:00


eero Pro 7 Review
Posted 23-Jul-2025 12:07


BeeStation Plus Review
Posted 21-Jul-2025 14:21


eero Unveils New Wi-Fi 7 Products in New Zealand
Posted 21-Jul-2025 00:01


WiZ Introduces HDMI Sync Box and other Light Devices
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:32


RedShield Enhances DDoS and Bot Attack Protection
Posted 20-Jul-2025 17:26


Seagate Ships 30TB Drives
Posted 17-Jul-2025 11:24


Oclean AirPump A10 Water Flosser Review
Posted 13-Jul-2025 11:05


Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: Raising the Bar for Smartphones
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Brings New Edge-To-Edge FlexWindow
Posted 10-Jul-2025 02:01


Epson Launches New AM-C550Z WorkForce Enterprise printer
Posted 9-Jul-2025 18:22


Samsung Releases Smart Monitor M9
Posted 9-Jul-2025 17:46


Nearly Half of Older Kiwis Still Write their Passwords on Paper
Posted 9-Jul-2025 08:42


D-Link 4G+ Cat6 Wi-Fi 6 DWR-933M Mobile Hotspot Review
Posted 1-Jul-2025 11:34


Oppo A5 Series Launches With New Levels of Durability
Posted 30-Jun-2025 10:15









Geekzone Live »

Try automatic live updates from Geekzone directly in your browser, without refreshing the page, with Geekzone Live now.



Are you subscribed to our RSS feed? You can download the latest headlines and summaries from our stories directly to your computer or smartphone by using a feed reader.