tdgeek:
mattwnz:
They can pretty much do what they want if conditions dictate it as it is a moving target. Watching the press conference today I think some people still don't understand the difference between elimination and eradication. My understanding is that they are still using the elimination strategy, but the PM said that it is unlikely they will get back down to zero cases. This is despite the media saying elimination is over, which IMO is not good messaging. We still need people following level 3 until vaccinations are high enough to flatten the curve and 'suppress cases'. The PM said that vaccination is showing to cut transmission by about 50%, which is not great. Otherwise we risk becoming another Victoria. But Victoria have ben in lockdowns for nearly a year, whereas NZ lockdowns have been 2-3 months in total.
Maybe that might happen, but we need to follow the math not the emotions or FB
30 cases, no issue. Many to follow are contacts, no issue. 45 I think they said today.
Elimination or eradication? Neither. Hold the cases by suppression until vaccine reach 90%. 97% of all cases this time around are unvaccinated. So, vaccination is the tool going forward.
Math, not emotions and complaints.
The PM said yesterday that vaccination was showing to prevent transmission by 50%. So there are going to be other tools needed, like Mask wearing, contact tracing and social distancing to a degree. I guess they will be tweaking these different tools to control the load on hospitals, once vaccination levels are high enough to move out of level 3.