mattwnz:
This is all true, and the lack of ICU beds in NZ has always been the major problem. But if you look at the graphs in the report https://cpb-ap-se2.wpmucdn.com/blogs.auckland.ac.nz/dist/d/75/files/2017/01/Stochastic-Model-FINAL-RELEASE.pdf , which we are crushing, it appears there are significant benefits in staying in level 4 for longer, in keeping the numbers down to a few and that maybe our only chance to actually eliminate it., which is similar to figure 7, but with no further cases.
There are some issues in this model concerning GER:
- We don't have Level 4 - we have some nonfood shopping/sports restrictions, social distancing and other things like no mass events. I could just take my bike and go biking the whole day, or walking with my spouse or fishing. The tool shops are open to give people the possibiliy to work on their homes or projects. The only requirement is to maintain 1.5m distance to others all time and not more than two people (plus kids belonging to the same household). B-B-Q with foreign household members (friends) is forbidden. Companies maintaining the rules are still operative when considered by them to be. I'd say we have something like Level 3 the whole time.
- Our current reproduction factor is 0.7 - not as stated 1.3 to 1.6. It's considered as stable when R<1.0
If you only could eliminate it asap, it would be a smooth preliminary exit. In that case you "only" have to monitor very close and could find a way out of the lockdown (with remaining precautions for sure). From my point of view a feasible and good way! But this costs patience and discipline but is FAR less that on-off-on-off tactics (we are more or less enforced to do it like this).
Economy takes it's toll anyway - our government i.e. has issued billions of money and loans for the next 20 years to come to keep business operations alive as much as possible for months INCLUDING the smaller self-employed. Here the (useless) moneymakers are pushing "back to business as usual" but they gonna teached new lessons they never knew before. I don't point to "our government" to show superiority or BS like that, I just like to demonstrate the seriousiness of the problem because we got it before you. The solution might differ from us, but the impact to our lives in general will not. When "Joe Neighbour" cancels his holidays in NZ, this might have an impact to your economy somehow. And there are many of "Joe Neighbours" around here who will not (cannot) visit NZ or any other country for the next time to come. Either for budget reasons or for (our) travel restriction reasons.