frankv:
You'll be pleased to know that no-one cares about you very much. ;) What they care about is the proportion of people who do/don't have access to a motor vehicle, and how much they use it. Those things are a bit difficult to measure, but per capita car ownership isn't, so per capita vehicle ownership is used as a coarse approximation of road use.
People who use it as a measure of something we must reduce are missing the point, VKT is the real issue. Cars don't emit carbon when they're sitting in a garage or someone's living room.
It can also spur EV adoption - a crappy range on a second-hand Leaf won't phase me if I can keep another vehicle for the times I need something a bit more potent or for longer drives.
But policies aimed at reducing the numbers of cars people can own - which does come up from time to time in these debates - would mean people hold out for vehicles which can be used to every possible use case, which is absurd.