Fred99:
LVRs were a hopeless idea in terms of housing affordability - and anybody suggesting that those LVRs are responsible for recent reported decrease in demand are dreaming. They (LVR) put first home ownership way out of reach for many young people in major cities, and reduced competition for cashed-up mortgage-free baby boomers (like me BTW) to buy rentals - and it seems that many of my peers have done exactly this - bought more rentals seeking the untaxed free money in what they see as an investment on which they can't lose.
LVRs were implemented to protect the integrity of the banking system - that they would or could significantly affect house price inflation was political spin.
I agree to a point, but it did reduce demand, by how much, nobody knows, as the election and winter also decrease demand. However, it wont decrease demand for those who have plenty of equity, that just increased the deposits cheque. As you say, it has removed demand from those who could squeak into their purchase, but now cannot buy what is likely to be an affordable option, but now the deposit is too big, again. From here, the reduced interest from foreignors will help. BUT, how many residents are foreign and are using wealthy parents funds?
What do you mean by untaxed free money, re rentals? You can claim expenses, and you get CGT'ed, where is the free money?