![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
old3eyes: I see in today's DomPost page C6 Infotech that Telecom is not going to lock it's new 3G handsets like Vodafone. Will be interesting to se what VF will do now. http://www.stuff.co.nz/4523351a28.html
Instead of trying to lock in customers on two year contracts, with locked phones, exorbitant data rates, and crappy customer service, how about investing in providing a service that is so good, that customers have no reason to want to leave?Your move, Vodafone...
amanzi: Vodafone are locking their handsets because they are afraid of the competition.
jpollock: Wow, does that mean that VF Live works when the customer is roaming?
Pretty impressive if it does.
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
sbiddle:I agree. As has been said, I doubt that Telecom or NZComms will be worried about a $50 rebate for changing networks.amanzi: Vodafone are locking their handsets because they are afraid of the competition.
I actually disagree with this. I see it solely as a money making venture. People are still free to move their handsets between networks, it's just ca$hing ca$hing everytime somebody wants to do this.
The fact Vodafone will happily provide an unlock code for money shows it's nothing about "protecting the end user experience". if it was about protecting the end user and ensuring that they don't get complaints when live! doesn't work when you insert another operator's SIM Vodafone wouldn't unlock handsets at all.
ninjabear: This was a quote on stuff.co.nz
Please support Geekzone by subscribing, or using one of our referral links: Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies | Hatch | GoodSync | Backblaze backup
First let me start by saying I work for Vodafone. I'm not high up the echelons, in fact I'm simply in sales. However, I do get to talk to many people in charge of decisions like these and hear much through our proverbial red grapevine.
Vodafone NZ makes substantially more net profit than Vodafone AU, despite the much higher user saturation in Australia. I'll let that sink in for a moment. It's run like any other business - to maximize profits. Therein lies the problem: we in New Zealand have inherent problems with poor management, from government through to their legislatory procedures [in determining how corporate entities conduct themselves], through to those said corporate entities. In theory, Telecom and Vodafone should have created a nice competitive climate - in practice they have somehow come to a 'gentlemans agreement' and maintained HORRENDOUSLY HIGH MOBILE PRICES - some of the highest in the world. Their argument has always been geographic restriction, that is, cost of creating and maintaining cell networks in a volcanic, rural, and low-user-density landscape with a technology that functions rather horizontally, with few exceptions. They paid off this infrastructure cost many years ago and are now reaping the rewards - minus maintenance. The exception is their 3G network which didn't immediately pay off, though it has now thanks to the data plans available.
Back to my original point, Vodafone will get away with anything the government allows that doesn't hurt their public perception enough for the initial act to pay off. Thankfully for them, Telecom already has a terrible monopolistic image, meaning Vodafone's many transgressions go wholly unnoticed or ignored - including this new handset locking policy. When these started occuring in the UK, the governing party actually created a whole new set of rules and regulations, controlling the ethical and legals implications of this new practice, and hence, market.
Most on this forum seem quite intelligent with their conclusions (more-so than the average 'Joe') and everyone is right to a degree. Yes, Vodafone wants another revenue stream. Yes, Vodafone wants to retain customers. Yes, it's cheaper and easier to do this to attain more revenue and retain more customers than increase the quality of their service. Yes, Vodafone makes more than enough money on call revenue alone to give every Texter 60 24month customer a free N95 (and still makes hundreds/thousands from you). No, Vodafone won't discount their handsets - until it hurts their bottom dollar. As an example, Vodafone purchase their handsets at bulk rates from the various manufacturers. The process takes months and incurs some risk if the handsets aren't eventually purchased (as we've seen recently with the horrible 'Vodafone 715' and 'Motorola V3x'). Vodafone purchases (at this bulk rate), the N95 (standard edition), for around $300 plus tax. It travels through several sales channels before eventually being sold to their valued customers for $1000. Their new 'Online Store' is just another way to cut out these channels and make more money.
One thing is for sure, Vodafone has been anticipating this new competitor for quite some time, signing people onto these new talker, texter and mega plans for 12/24 month terms - and they are scared; so is Telecom for that matter. This is GREAT news for the average mobile user in New Zealand. I hope it goes as well as Kiwibank did at increasing competition and shaking up an antiquated and oligopolising industry. I have a feeling it will.
This means DON'T SIGN UP ON ANY PLANS. DONT BUY ANY BRANDED PHONES. Just wait for the new competitor to arrive and raise all hell and magically, overnight, both Vodafone and Telecom will 'find ways' of giving us better value. I say show them that screwing us for all these years then trying to better new competition should not be rewarded. I'll be moving suppliers the second they come on-air.
PaulBrislen: you work for Vodafone?
Try getting the terminology right, eh?
Cheers
Paul
(Best laugh I've had all day)
Regards,
Old3eyes
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |