![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Agent24:
Well considering the alternative is simply purchasing CDs which I can then rip to FLAC, neither of which force me to install any specific program... well I think that's pretty fair.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
SaltyNZ:Agent24:
Well considering the alternative is simply purchasing CDs which I can then rip to FLAC, neither of which force me to install any specific program... well I think that's pretty fair.
Yeahbut... you have to go outside. Where there's sunshine. SUNSHINE.
Common sense is not as common as you think.
vexxxboy:SaltyNZ:Agent24:
Well considering the alternative is simply purchasing CDs which I can then rip to FLAC, neither of which force me to install any specific program... well I think that's pretty fair.
Yeahbut... you have to go outside. Where there's sunshine. SUNSHINE.
my son has a T shirt which says it all " Outside, is that a secret level"
Agent24:
Well considering the alternative is simply purchasing CDs which I can then rip to FLAC, neither of which force me to install any specific program... well I think that's pretty fair.
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
SaltyNZ:Agent24:
Well considering the alternative is simply purchasing CDs which I can then rip to FLAC, neither of which force me to install any specific program... well I think that's pretty fair.
Sure. Personally though - speaking as someone who owns DVD-A discs - I think the biggest issue is not AAC. It's the fact that 99% of music is compressed to hell. Dynamic range? We've heard of it.
I can hear the distortion in 192K MP3; I cannot in 256K or better, and certainly not in 256K AAC, which is better than MP3 at the same bit rate. I too would like it if iTunes made music available in lossless formats but the reality is it doesn't matter most of the time. Also, Apple recently released an open source codec for ALAC so "closed source is evil" doesn't really carry any weight as an argument either.
Alas, even though in the before-girlfriend days I spent a bazillion dollars on high quality audio equipment these days I listen to music in the car or in headphones, because the only music you can play in a house of young children was recorded by grownup men who dance with pirates and dinosaurs.
Also, my wife keeps moving the speakers out of alignment because it LOOKS BETTER. O_o
Agent24:
Then add to that what others have already said - iTunes costs more per track than a CD!
Why the hell would I want to pay MORE for something of LESS quality? It's just insane!
iPad Pro 11" + iPhone 15 Pro Max + 2degrees 4tw!
These comments are my own and do not represent the opinions of 2degrees.
Agent24:SaltyNZ:Agent24:
Well considering the alternative is simply purchasing CDs which I can then rip to FLAC, neither of which force me to install any specific program... well I think that's pretty fair.
Sure. Personally though - speaking as someone who owns DVD-A discs - I think the biggest issue is not AAC. It's the fact that 99% of music is compressed to hell. Dynamic range? We've heard of it.
I can hear the distortion in 192K MP3; I cannot in 256K or better, and certainly not in 256K AAC, which is better than MP3 at the same bit rate. I too would like it if iTunes made music available in lossless formats but the reality is it doesn't matter most of the time. Also, Apple recently released an open source codec for ALAC so "closed source is evil" doesn't really carry any weight as an argument either.
Alas, even though in the before-girlfriend days I spent a bazillion dollars on high quality audio equipment these days I listen to music in the car or in headphones, because the only music you can play in a house of young children was recorded by grownup men who dance with pirates and dinosaurs.
Also, my wife keeps moving the speakers out of alignment because it LOOKS BETTER. O_o
Yeah sure, most people can't tell the difference (at a high enough bitrate) probably me included. BUT we've had 'CD Quality' for decades!
MP3s and anything else with LESS quality is a step backwards - and in my opinion - completely stupid. With cheaper storage, faster internet connections and the like, you'd think things should get better, not worse.
Then add to that what others have already said - iTunes costs more per track than a CD!
Why the hell would I want to pay MORE for something of LESS quality? It's just insane!
Maybe I can't hear the difference but my wallet would feel the difference, and I would certainly feel the difference with a great big feeling of getting ripped off. It would not be satisfying.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() |