wellygary:tdgeek:Ok, I guess that's saying they cannot trust a negative test
Sort of,
Its just they are unsure if there will have been enough time between exposure and the test to develop enough viral load for detection...
As mentioned above, we did the same in the most recent outbreak, requiring close and close+ to test at 5 days and at 12 days, and to isolate for the full period...
If time between exposure and time to develop a detectable viral load were the only factors then I think we’d be treating casual and close contacts the same and testing at day 12 also and isolating for 14 days? They’ve both had exposures. The only difference is the likelihood of actually being infected which defines the difference between a casual and close contact.