Rocket Labs Humanity Star, very cool

Forums › Off topic › Rocket Labs Humanity Star, very cool

tdgeek

30048 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 9455

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#228847 25-Jan-2018 14:30

Like ISS but it blinks, and while its teeny, its naked eye visible

http://www.newshub.co.nz/home/new-zealand/2018/01/how-to-see-rocket-lab-s-humanity-star.html

About and How to View

http://www.thehumanitystar.com/

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 7

5889 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2094

ID Verified

#1946640 25-Jan-2018 15:02

I heard a headline on the radio this morning about an astronomer who is likening RocketLab to Trump for arrogantly putting something into the night sky 'for ego' or something similar.

I sort of agreed with him at the time (I was driving to work) - a little bit arrogant putting something up there shining bright and all.

I got to work and read about it and changed my mind. It will only be there a few months before disintegrating back into the atmosphere. Pretty cool I reckon. NZs first Satellite - and it is something we can all see!

Mistenfuru

198 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 120

#1946645 25-Jan-2018 15:07

I agree, Anything that increases peoples curiosity in Space and Science can never be bad.

World of Warcraft Veteran, Avid Sci-Fi Geek.

ISP - Technical Support - Lines and infrastructure.

Coil

6614 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2153
Inactive user

#1946646 25-Jan-2018 15:07

trig42:

I heard a headline on the radio this morning about an astronomer who is likening RocketLab to Trump for arrogantly putting something into the night sky 'for ego' or something similar.

I sort of agreed with him at the time (I was driving to work) - a little bit arrogant putting something up there shining bright and all.

I got to work and read about it and changed my mind. It will only be there a few months before disintegrating back into the atmosphere. Pretty cool I reckon. NZs first Satellite - and it is something we can all see!

Could be worse, Could be a nation tied up in everyone else affairs putting spy crap in the sky. Whop Dee Doo, A reflective bit of junk that will fall out of orbit very soon...

Or is that what we are supposed to think?

trig42

5889 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2094

ID Verified

#1946664 25-Jan-2018 15:10

Yes, don't look directly at it without a Tin-Foil hat and X-Ray Glasses form the back of a 70's comic book. Mind control...

freitasm

BDFL - Memuneh
80655 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 41052

Administrator

ID Verified

Trusted

Geekzone

Lifetime subscriber

#1946667 25-Jan-2018 15:14

Do we need more stuff in space? Sure, what is one more to add to the more of 500,000 pieces already there (as of 2013)...

If you didn't detect the sarcasm, I meant we don't need more junk up there. and when it comes back where is it going to land? Is it safe? Won't it hit any airplane or fall into someone's roof?

Referral links: Quic Broadband (free setup code: R587125ERQ6VE) | Samsung | AliExpress | Wise | Sharesies

Support Geekzone by subscribing (browse ads-free), or making a one-off or recurring donation through PressPatron.

MurrayM

2502 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 742

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1946682 25-Jan-2018 15:22

freitasm:

Do we need more stuff in space? Sure, what is one more to add to the more of 500,000 pieces already there (as of 2013)...

If you didn't detect the sarcasm, I meant we don't need more junk up there. and when it comes back where is it going to land? Is it safe? Won't it hit any airplane or fall into someone's roof?

What will happen to it when it de-orbits?

The Humanity Star will burn up on re-entry into the Earth’s atmosphere, leaving no trace in space or on Earth.

Dyson

Shop now for Dyson appliances (affiliate link).

throbb

675 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 167

#1946684 25-Jan-2018 15:26

freitasm:

Do we need more stuff in space? Sure, what is one more to add to the more of 500,000 pieces already there (as of 2013)...

If you didn't detect the sarcasm, I meant we don't need more junk up there. and when it comes back where is it going to land? Is it safe? Won't it hit any airplane or fall into someone's roof?

The difference to most of the junk up there is,

This has a 3 month life span before it falls out of orbit
Its small and light weight and will totally disintegrate on re-entry

MikeAqua

8030 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 3819

#1946691 25-Jan-2018 15:35

trig42:

I heard a headline on the radio this morning about an astronomer who is likening RocketLab to Trump for arrogantly putting something into the night sky 'for ego' or something similar.

Beck was on the AM show today. His motive for Humanity Star was that he thinks the first time a nation puts something in space it should be noticeable to mark the occasion. He talked about Sputnik outputting a radio ping, which you could only detect if you had a SW radio (in 1957).

He thought Humanity Star should be noticeable by anyone on earth. Obviously you need eyesight and clear night sky at the right time.

Mike

trig42

5889 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2094

ID Verified

#1946721 25-Jan-2018 15:42

Here is that article in NZ Herald - Ian Griffin quite angry about it. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11981960

IMO, it is cool. Looking forward to seeing it.

Coil

6614 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 2153
Inactive user

#1946748 25-Jan-2018 16:05

trig42:

Here is that article in NZ Herald - Ian Griffin quite angry about it. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11981960

IMO, it is cool. Looking forward to seeing it.

He has a chip on his shoulder as a self proclaimed Astrology expert. He will have a reason to try and deface the company.

antoniosk

2383 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 745

ID Verified

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1946749 25-Jan-2018 16:10

freitasm:

Do we need more stuff in space? Sure, what is one more to add to the more of 500,000 pieces already there (as of 2013)...

If you didn't detect the sarcasm, I meant we don't need more junk up there. and when it comes back where is it going to land? Is it safe? Won't it hit any airplane or fall into someone's roof?

I wonder if it's aimed at the Hutt Valley specifically.... ;-)

Visible across NZ on Feb 20th, from 10pm I'm told. Whether that's reliable, who knows?

________

Antoniosk

Geekzone

Want to support Geekzone and browse the site without the ads? Subscribe to Geekzone now (monthly, annual and lifetime options).

Mistenfuru

198 posts

Master Geek
+1 received by user: 120

#1946753 25-Jan-2018 16:14

antoniosk:

freitasm:

Do we need more stuff in space? Sure, what is one more to add to the more of 500,000 pieces already there (as of 2013)...

If you didn't detect the sarcasm, I meant we don't need more junk up there. and when it comes back where is it going to land? Is it safe? Won't it hit any airplane or fall into someone's roof?

I wonder if it's aimed at the Hutt Valley specifically.... ;-)

Visible across NZ on Feb 20th, from 10pm I'm told. Whether that's reliable, who knows?

Very reliable, the website has a live tracker of it's orbital trajectory too http://www.thehumanitystar.com/

World of Warcraft Veteran, Avid Sci-Fi Geek.

ISP - Technical Support - Lines and infrastructure.

geocom

597 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 143

Subscriber

#1946772 25-Jan-2018 16:29

trig42:

Here is that article in NZ Herald - Ian Griffin quite angry about it. http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=3&objectid=11981960

Some of the tweets quoted in that article are laughably bad they act like it's static and will block the view of stars.

Orbiting the Earth every 90 minutes

It will come and go very quickly from the night sky that you can observe. Now if they had put it in a geosynchronous orbit then I would be more open to their objections but it's not.

I also would not consider it space junk for the simple reason that it is not defunct is at a low orbit has a planned EOL and is on a tracked orbit uptil it reenters the earths atmosphere to die. To understand the real concern with space junk take a look at the Kessler Syndrome I would not put Humanity's star in this category.

Geoff E

Stan

929 posts

Ultimate Geek
+1 received by user: 183
Inactive user

#1946786 25-Jan-2018 16:45

Some people in the comments sections on these articles really need to understand that small low earth orbit objects typically enter the Earth's atmosphere relatively quickly after they are defunct and completely burn up as I understand the issues with space junk is generally not at low orbit.

Behodar

11101 posts

Uber Geek
+1 received by user: 6089

Trusted

Lifetime subscriber

#1946788 25-Jan-2018 16:50

geocom: Some of the tweets quoted in that article are laughably bad

tdgeek: its naked eye visible

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | ... | 7